AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 26, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesWeyland v. Second Judicial District Court, et al.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Weyland v. Second Judicial District Court, et al.

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

D. Nevada · Oct 20, 2026

NV / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationscivil rightstrialWarning
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | The court identified a cited case as apparently fictitious because the case name did not match the cited case number and the matter had no connection to the ADA. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in D. Nevada. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | The court identified a cited case as apparently fictitious because the case name did not match the cited case number and the matter had no connection to the ADA. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in D. Nevada. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

NevadaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore NVOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtD. Nevada
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateOct 20, 2026
NO
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | The court identified a cited case as apparently fictitious because the case name did not match the cited case number and the matter had no connection to the ADA.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | The court identified a second cited case as apparently fictitious because the case name did not match the cited case number and the matter had no connection to the ADA.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Weyland v. Second Judicial District Court, et al.?
Fabricated: Case Law | The court identified a cited case as apparently fictitious because the case name did not match the cited case number and the matter had no connection to the ADA. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Weyland v. Second Judicial District Court, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in D. Nevada. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Weyland v. Second Judicial District Court, et al.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Weyland v. Second Judicial District Court, et al. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Harvey v. Torrent Leasing & U.S. BankD. Nevada · Dec 15, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsSaxena v. Martinez-Hernandez et al.D. Nevada · Feb 18, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsJoseph M. Speranza v. Golden Technologies, Inc.D. Nevada · Aug 21, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsKelly v. Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityD. Nevada · Aug 19, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsThu Thuy Nguyen v. PennyMac Loan ServicesD. Nevada · Jan 7, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsSims v. Souily-Lefave (2)D. Nevada · Apr 15, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.