TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Shawn Olali v. Ampex Brands, LLC

N.D. Texas · Feb 23, 2026

Jurisdiction: federal
Court: N.D. Texas
Record ID: shawn-olali-v-ampex-brands-llc-2026-02-23
Observed outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's claims without prejudice and issued a formal warning regarding future Rule 11 violations.
Known monetary consequence: Not recorded

ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court issued a formal warning to a pro se litigant regarding the submission of pleadings containing citations to nonexistent cases, noting that such conduct violates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and may result in future sanctions.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's pleadings included citations to nonexistent cases; the court noted these fabricated citations and warned of Rule 11 sanctions.

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Texas, with the listed outcome: Warning.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

Pro Se
Fake Citations
Other
Trial
Warning

AI attribution: Reported
Recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence: Not recorded
Procedural posture: Order accepting findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge; partial motion to dismiss granted; claims dismissed without prejudice.

PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
Escalate and correct a suspect filing promptly, with a documented response.

EXPLAINABLE COMPARATORS

Related public matters

Pamon v. United States Postal Service et alN.D. Texas · Jul 22, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Johnson v. Digital Federal Credit UnionN.D. Texas · Dec 30, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Jayroe v. Progressive Casualty Insurance CompanyN.D. Texas · Oct 27, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations

Why this matter warrants attention

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's pleadings included citations to nonexistent cases; the court noted these fabricated citations and warned of Rule 11 sanctions.

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Texas, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Failure modes and consequences

Pro Se

Fake Citations

Other

Trial

Warning

AI attribution

Reported

Recorded tool

AI (implied, unspecified)

Known monetary consequence

Not recorded

Procedural posture

Order accepting findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge; partial motion to dismiss granted; claims dismissed without prejudice.