AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 26, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesPamon v. United States Postal Service et al
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Pamon v. United States Postal Service et al

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

N.D. Texas · Jul 22, 2026

TX / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsothertrialWarning
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Pamon cited McCarty v. United States, using the Westlaw-style citation 2015 WL 1543969, which the court could not locate and Pamon failed to produce a PDF for. Outcome: Warning about AI use upheld on objection to the magistrate judge's order (the USD 610 award is a Rule 37(d) discovery order, not tied to AI).

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning about AI use upheld on objection to the magistrate judge's order (the USD 610 award is a Rule 37(d) discovery order, not tied to AI). The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning about AI use upheld on objection to the magistrate judge's order (the USD 610 award is a Rule 37(d) discovery order, not tied to AI) in N.D. Texas. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Pamon cited McCarty v. United States, using the Westlaw-style citation 2015 WL 1543969, which the court could not locate and Pamon failed to produce a PDF for. Outcome: Warning about AI use upheld on objection to the magistrate judge's order (the USD 610 award is a Rule 37(d) discovery order, not tied to AI).

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning about AI use upheld on objection to the magistrate judge's order (the USD 610 award is a Rule 37(d) discovery order, not tied to AI) in N.D. Texas. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

TexasSingle-state evidence scope
Explore TXOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtN.D. Texas
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit5th Circuit
DateJul 22, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning about AI use upheld on objection to the magistrate judge's order (the USD 610 award is a Rule 37(d) discovery order, not tied to AI)
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning about AI use upheld on objection to the magistrate judge's order (the USD 610 award is a Rule 37(d) discovery order, not tied to AI)

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Pamon cited McCarty v. United States, using the Westlaw-style citation 2015 WL 1543969, which the court could not locate and Pamon failed to produce a PDF for.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Pamon cited Harris v. Dallas Cnty. Hosp. Dist., using the Westlaw-style citation 2022 WL 17830420, which the court could not locate and Pamon failed to produce a PDF for.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Pamon v. United States Postal Service et al?
Fabricated: Case Law | Pamon cited McCarty v. United States, using the Westlaw-style citation 2015 WL 1543969, which the court could not locate and Pamon failed to produce a PDF for. Outcome: Warning about AI use upheld on objection to the magistrate judge's order (the USD 610 award is a Rule 37(d) discovery order, not tied to AI).
Why does Pamon v. United States Postal Service et al matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning about AI use upheld on objection to the magistrate judge's order (the USD 610 award is a Rule 37(d) discovery order, not tied to AI) in N.D. Texas. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Pamon v. United States Postal Service et al?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Pamon v. United States Postal Service et al summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Shawn Olali v. Ampex Brands, LLCN.D. Texas · Feb 23, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsJayroe v. Progressive Casualty Insurance CompanyN.D. Texas · Oct 27, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsEzenwa Ebem v. Bondi et al.N.D. Texas · Sep 15, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsImperial Reliance, LLC v. HZ Properties & Marketing, LLCN.D. Texas · Aug 18, 2026same court · fake citations + otherHartmann v. DavidsonN.D. Texas · Mar 12, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsJohnson v. Digital Federal Credit UnionN.D. Texas · Dec 30, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.