Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0GEGWU4Generated September 10, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Taylor v. Cooper Power & Lighting Corp.

E.D. New York · Jun 13, 2025

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
E.D. New York
Record ID
taylor-v-cooper-power-lighting-corp-2025-06-13
Observed outcome
Warning
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Outcome: Warning. "In Rutella's reply in support of his motion to vacate, he cites Green v. John H. Streater, Jr., 666 F.2d 119 (3d Cir. 1981). DE [69-1] at 8. When the Court was unable to locate Green or any case resembling it, the Court instructed Rutella's attorney, Kevin Krupnick, to either submit a copy of the case or show cause why he should not be sanctioned. See Electronic Order dated May 22, 2025. Krupnick admitted that he fabricated the Green case and claimed that he used it as a “placeholder” in a draft. DE [70-1]. It is implausible that an attorney would cite a case as specific as “Green v. John H. Streater, Jr., 666 F.2d 119 (3d Cir.…

Why the decision-maker cared

The linked record identifies trial and records Warning. This page does not infer judicial reasoning beyond the source.

Why it matters now

The "placeholder" excuse does not survive scrutiny — never cite a case you have not read, and never lie to the court about why.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Trial
  • Warning
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Warning
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Latest evidence review: Metadata Only (medium confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Apply the same source-checking controls to AI (implied, unspecified) output as to any other research input.
  2. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.