Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Henri Giovani Morales Jimenez v. Christopher Shanahan
E.D. New York · May 13, 2026
NY / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsimmigrationtrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
In Henri Giovani Morales Jimenez v. Christopher Shanahan, the E.D. New York addressed a Fabricated: Case Law in a lawyer filing. The linked source records that counsel relied on at least one nonexistent case; the court found that at least one cited authority did not exist. The recorded procedural consequence is Admonishment. The entry is dated 2026-05-13. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding. The underlying source should be consulted for the complete filing and any later procedural developments.
- Why the court cared
- The linked source identifies the filing problem as: Counsel relied on at least one nonexistent case; the court found that at least one cited authority did not exist..
- Why it matters now
- The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a federal proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
Why this matter is tracked
In Henri Giovani Morales Jimenez v. Christopher Shanahan, the E.D. New York addressed a Fabricated: Case Law in a lawyer filing. The linked source records that counsel relied on at least one nonexistent case; the court found that at least one cited authority did not exist. The recorded procedural consequence is Admonishment. The entry is dated 2026-05-13. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding. The underlying source should be consulted for the complete filing and any later procedural developments.
Operational lesson
The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a federal proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
Record details
New YorkSingle-state evidence scope
CourtE.D. New York
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateMay 13, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeAdmonishment
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Admonishment
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel relied on at least one nonexistent case; the court found that at least one cited authority did not exist.
- Outdated Advice: Overturned Case Law | Counsel relied on a Supreme Court case that the court described as abrogated (overturned); the court noted the reliance on an abrogated precedent.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Henri Giovani Morales Jimenez v. Christopher Shanahan?
- In Henri Giovani Morales Jimenez v. Christopher Shanahan, the E.D. New York addressed a Fabricated: Case Law in a lawyer filing. The linked source records that counsel relied on at least one nonexistent case; the court found that at least one cited authority did not exist. The recorded procedural consequence is Admonishment. The entry is dated 2026-05-13. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding. The underlying source should be consulted for the complete filing and any later procedural developments.
- Why does Henri Giovani Morales Jimenez v. Christopher Shanahan matter for legal AI risk?
- The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a federal proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
- What does the public record establish about Henri Giovani Morales Jimenez v. Christopher Shanahan?
- Limited to the linked source and the documented citation or quotation issue and stated disposition; no unrecorded tool, motive, or broader litigation facts are inferred.
- Which source supports this Henri Giovani Morales Jimenez v. Christopher Shanahan summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.