Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0FA0BGBGenerated September 10, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Vanderberg v. Shviro

Rehovot Small Claims Court · Jan 12, 2026

Jurisdiction
international
Court
Rehovot Small Claims Court
Record ID
vanderberg-v-shviro-2026-01-12
Observed outcome
The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay 3,000 ILS in costs to the state treasury.
Known monetary consequence
₪3,000
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The Supreme Court of Israel dismissed an appeal and imposed a 3,000 ILS monetary sanction on a pro se litigant for including four fabricated legal citations in his brief, which the court attributed to AI hallucinations.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | 4 fake citations

Why it matters now

Small-claims fines for fake cites are now standardized globally—expect monetary consequences even in low-value matters.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Other
  • Trial
  • Monetary
AI attribution
Implied
Recorded tool
AI (unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
₪3,000
Procedural posture
Appeal of a Rehovot Small Claims Court decision regarding a judicial disqualification request.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The court suspected the citations originated from AI hallucinations.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.