Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Vanderberg v. Shviro
Rehovot Small Claims Court · Jan 12, 2026
IsraelEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsothertrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
In Vanderberg v. Shviro, the Rehovot court dismissed an appeal that included four purported authorities on judicial disqualification. The court found that all four citations were fictitious, with mismatched case numbers, parties, and subject matter, and said they appeared to be AI hallucinations. It dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to pay NIS 3,000 in costs.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | 4 fake citations
- Why it matters now
- Small-claims fines for fake cites are now standardized globally—expect monetary consequences even in low-value matters.
Why this matter is tracked
In Vanderberg v. Shviro, the Rehovot court dismissed an appeal that included four purported authorities on judicial disqualification. The court found that all four citations were fictitious, with mismatched case numbers, parties, and subject matter, and said they appeared to be AI hallucinations. It dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to pay NIS 3,000 in costs.
Operational lesson
Small-claims fines for fake cites are now standardized globally—expect monetary consequences even in low-value matters.
Record details
CourtRehovot Small Claims Court
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJan 12, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeMonetary Sanction
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Monetary Sanction
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | 4 fake citations
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Vanderberg v. Shviro?
- In Vanderberg v. Shviro, the Rehovot court dismissed an appeal that included four purported authorities on judicial disqualification. The court found that all four citations were fictitious, with mismatched case numbers, parties, and subject matter, and said they appeared to be AI hallucinations. It dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to pay NIS 3,000 in costs.
- Why does Vanderberg v. Shviro matter for legal AI risk?
- Small-claims fines for fake cites are now standardized globally—expect monetary consequences even in low-value matters.
- What does the public record establish about Vanderberg v. Shviro?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Vanderberg v. Shviro summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.