AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 1, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 31, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesCharlie Reyes v. Bryce Bailey, et al.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Charlie Reyes v. Bryce Bailey, et al.

D. New Mexico · Aug 28, 2026

NM / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsothertrialNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff miscited (and may have fabricated) a case citation in his Amended Complaint; defendants reasonably alleged fabrication and court relied on plaintiff's admission. Outcome: No Sanctions. Plaintiff (pro se) admitted he miscited a case in his Amended Complaint. Defendants reasonably alleged the citation may have been fabricated. The Court found the defendants' contention reasonable given the plaintiff's admission, but declined to impose Rule 11 sanctions, concluding there was no violation and that other alleged defects did not warrant sanctions.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records No Sanctions. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with No Sanctions in D. New Mexico. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff miscited (and may have fabricated) a case citation in his Amended Complaint; defendants reasonably alleged fabrication and court relied on plaintiff's admission. Outcome: No Sanctions. Plaintiff (pro se) admitted he miscited a case in his Amended Complaint. Defendants reasonably alleged the citation may have been fabricated. The Court found the defendants' contention reasonable given the plaintiff's admission, but declined to impose Rule 11 sanctions, concluding there was no violation and that other alleged defects did not warrant sanctions.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with No Sanctions in D. New Mexico. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New MexicoSingle-state evidence scope
Explore NMOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtD. New Mexico
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit10th Circuit
DateAug 28, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeNo Sanctions
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

No Sanctions

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff miscited (and may have fabricated) a case citation in his Amended Complaint; defendants reasonably alleged fabrication and court relied on plaintiff's admission.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Charlie Reyes v. Bryce Bailey, et al.?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff miscited (and may have fabricated) a case citation in his Amended Complaint; defendants reasonably alleged fabrication and court relied on plaintiff's admission. Outcome: No Sanctions. Plaintiff (pro se) admitted he miscited a case in his Amended Complaint. Defendants reasonably alleged the citation may have been fabricated. The Court found the defendants' contention reasonable given the plaintiff's admission, but declined to impose Rule 11 sanctions, concluding there was no violation and that other alleged defects did not warrant sanctions.
Why does Charlie Reyes v. Bryce Bailey, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with No Sanctions in D. New Mexico. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Charlie Reyes v. Bryce Bailey, et al.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Charlie Reyes v. Bryce Bailey, et al. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Clifford Robert Cummings v. The Estate of Forrest FennD. New Mexico · Oct 30, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsSample et al v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings, IncD. New Mexico · May 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsLowrey v. City of Rio Rancho et al. (2)D. New Mexico · May 21, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsCarlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.D. New Mexico · Nov 25, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsLowrey v. City of Rio Rancho et al. (1)D. New Mexico · Nov 5, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsTomlin v. State of New MexicoD. New Mexico · Feb 1, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations