Chirece C. v. Commissioner of Social Security
E.D. Michigan · Sep 24, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- E.D. Michigan
- Record ID
- chirece-c-v-commissioner-of-social-security-2026-09-24
- Observed outcome
- Monetary Fine
- Known monetary consequence
- $500
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | A nonexistent Williams case was cited as authority for the proposition that inability to sustain sitting or standing because of medically necessary leg elevation precludes competitive sedentary employment. The cited reference instead concerned Widi v. McNeil from the District of Maine and did not involve Social Security. Outcome: Monetary Fine.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Monetary Fine. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Fine in E.D. Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Administrative
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- $500
- Procedural posture
- Monetary Fine
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.