Fay v. Warren Hospitality Suites, Inc.
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
E.D. Michigan · Sep 9, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's filings attributed apparently fictitious quotations to judicial decisions; the court found that the quotations did not appear to exist. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Monetary Sanction. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction in E.D. Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's filings attributed apparently fictitious quotations to judicial decisions; the court found that the quotations did not appear to exist. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction in E.D. Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Monetary Sanction
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's filings attributed apparently fictitious quotations to judicial decisions; the court found that the quotations did not appear to exist.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff's filings cited cases for propositions they did not support and used parentheticals that did not accurately reflect the cited decisions; counsel acknowledged at least eleven such instances.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Fay v. Warren Hospitality Suites, Inc.?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's filings attributed apparently fictitious quotations to judicial decisions; the court found that the quotations did not appear to exist. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
- Why does Fay v. Warren Hospitality Suites, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction in E.D. Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Fay v. Warren Hospitality Suites, Inc.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Fay v. Warren Hospitality Suites, Inc. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.