Glenn v. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, et al.
M.D. Florida · Oct 9, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- M.D. Florida
- Record ID
- glenn-v-absolute-resolutions-investments-llc-et-al-2026-10-09
- Observed outcome
- None Adjudicated
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | The memorandum cited a nonexistent case. The Court identified the citation as fake, but the decision does not provide the citation’s name or reporter reference. Counsel filed a memorandum containing at least two AI-generated errors: one citation referred to a nonexistent case, and another cited an existing case that did not contain the quotation attributed to it. Counsel admitted failing to review AI-assisted research before filing. The Court emphasized counsel’s duty to provide accurate citations and found that his apology, client and opposing-counsel notifications, donation of approximately $10,000 in fees to Jacksonville Area Legal Aid, AI-ethics CLE, and revised office procedures were a suitable remedy. No further action was ordered.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in M.D. Florida. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Other
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.