Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
The Doc App, Inc. d/b/a My Florida Green v. Leafwell, Inc. (1)
M.D. Florida · Nov 26, 2025
FL / federalEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritybar referral
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Motion cited Henson v. Allison Transmission with reporter/citation No. 6:16-cv-1223-Orl-41DCI, 2017 WL 59085 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 5, 2017), which the Court confirmed does not exist; counsel later said he intended a different Henson (2008 WL 239153), but that case does not support the propositions cited. Outcome: Costs Order; CLE Order; Order to file Order in any future filing; Bar Referral.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Motion cited Henson v. Allison Transmission with reporter/citation No. 6:16-cv-1223-Orl-41DCI, 2017 WL 59085 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 5, 2017), which the Court confirmed does not exist; counsel later said he intended a different Henson (2008 WL 239153), but that case does not support the propositions cited. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Motion cited State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Pressley as 727 So. 2d 1019, 1020 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (yielded nothing in Westlaw); counsel later pointed to 28 So. 3d 105 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), but that decision does not contain the quoted phrase or discuss the statute counsel attributed to it. || False Quotes: Case Law | At least two quotations in the Motion were presented as direct quotes but the cited cases do not contain the quoted language (counsel claimed an earlier draft/paraphrase error).
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Costs Order; CLE Order; Order to file Order in any future filing; Bar Referral.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Motion cited Henson v. Allison Transmission with reporter/citation No. 6:16-cv-1223-Orl-41DCI, 2017 WL 59085 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 5, 2017), which the Court confirmed does not exist; counsel later said he intended a different Henson (2008 WL 239153), but that case does not support the propositions cited. Outcome: Costs Order; CLE Order; Order to file Order in any future filing; Bar Referral.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Costs Order; CLE Order; Order to file Order in any future filing; Bar Referral.
Record details
FloridaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtM.D. Florida
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit11th Circuit
DateNov 26, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeCosts Order; CLE Order; Order to file Order in any future filing; Bar Referral
Known amount$1
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Costs Order; CLE Order; Order to file Order in any future filing; Bar Referral
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Motion cited Henson v. Allison Transmission with reporter/citation No. 6:16-cv-1223-Orl-41DCI, 2017 WL 59085 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 5, 2017), which the Court confirmed does not exist; counsel later said he intended a different Henson (2008 WL 239153), but that case does not support the propositions cited.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Motion cited State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Pressley as 727 So. 2d 1019, 1020 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (yielded nothing in Westlaw); counsel later pointed to 28 So. 3d 105 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), but that decision does not contain the quoted phrase or discuss the statute counsel attributed to it.
- False Quotes: Case Law | At least two quotations in the Motion were presented as direct quotes but the cited cases do not contain the quoted language (counsel claimed an earlier draft/paraphrase error).
Questions this record answers
- What happened in The Doc App, Inc. d/b/a My Florida Green v. Leafwell, Inc. (1)?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Motion cited Henson v. Allison Transmission with reporter/citation No. 6:16-cv-1223-Orl-41DCI, 2017 WL 59085 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 5, 2017), which the Court confirmed does not exist; counsel later said he intended a different Henson (2008 WL 239153), but that case does not support the propositions cited. Outcome: Costs Order; CLE Order; Order to file Order in any future filing; Bar Referral.
- Why does The Doc App, Inc. d/b/a My Florida Green v. Leafwell, Inc. (1) matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Costs Order; CLE Order; Order to file Order in any future filing; Bar Referral.
- What does the public record establish about The Doc App, Inc. d/b/a My Florida Green v. Leafwell, Inc. (1)?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this The Doc App, Inc. d/b/a My Florida Green v. Leafwell, Inc. (1) summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.