HomeCasesFarag v. Persante et al

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Farag v. Persante et al

M.D. Florida · Jan 26, 2026

FL / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authority

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Holt v. Crown Builders, Inc., 627 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)'; court found this authority does not exist. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Holt v. Crown Builders, Inc., 627 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)'; court found this authority does not exist. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Bennett v. Bivins, 685 Case 8:25-cv-03056-SDM-AEP,' which the court found to be nonexistent or erroneous. || Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Plaintiff misquoted Section 733.903, Florida Statutes; the quoted language does not appear in the statute and the court corrected the actual statutory text. || Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff claimed Exhibit 1 was an entry of clerk's default, but the court found Exhibit 1 was not an entry of default. || Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff asserted Exhibit 3 was a 'formal Certificate of Default'; court found Exhibit 3 was the plaintiff's motion for default, not an entered order. || Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff alleged the lawyer appeared 'without any lawful authority or court approval,' but Exhibit 5 was the lawyer's notice of appearance filed in compliance with rules.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Holt v. Crown Builders, Inc., 627 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)'; court found this authority does not exist. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtM.D. Florida

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit11th Circuit

DateJan 26, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Holt v. Crown Builders, Inc., 627 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)'; court found this authority does not exist.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Bennett v. Bivins, 685 Case 8:25-cv-03056-SDM-AEP,' which the court found to be nonexistent or erroneous.
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Plaintiff misquoted Section 733.903, Florida Statutes; the quoted language does not appear in the statute and the court corrected the actual statutory text.
Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff claimed Exhibit 1 was an entry of clerk's default, but the court found Exhibit 1 was not an entry of default.
Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff asserted Exhibit 3 was a 'formal Certificate of Default'; court found Exhibit 3 was the plaintiff's motion for default, not an entered order.
Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff alleged the lawyer appeared 'without any lawful authority or court approval,' but Exhibit 5 was the lawyer's notice of appearance filed in compliance with rules.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Farag v. Persante et al?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Holt v. Crown Builders, Inc., 627 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)'; court found this authority does not exist. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Farag v. Persante et al matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Farag v. Persante et al?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Farag v. Persante et al summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Stringer v. White Cap Supply Holdings, LLCM.D. Florida · May 14, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Charles C. Force v. Capital One, N.A., et al.M.D. Florida · Oct 15, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Edwards v. De Cubas & Lewis, P.A.M.D. Florida · Jul 1, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Leafwell, Inc. v. The Doc App, Inc. (2)M.D. Florida · Jun 9, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Jacob Barry Allston v. Ron DeSantis, et al.M.D. Florida · Dec 4, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations USA v. BrewerM.D. Florida · Sep 11, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtM.D. Florida

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit11th Circuit

DateJan 26, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Holt v. Crown Builders, Inc., 627 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)'; court found this authority does not exist.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Bennett v. Bivins, 685 Case 8:25-cv-03056-SDM-AEP,' which the court found to be nonexistent or erroneous.

Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Plaintiff misquoted Section 733.903, Florida Statutes; the quoted language does not appear in the statute and the court corrected the actual statutory text.

Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff claimed Exhibit 1 was an entry of clerk's default, but the court found Exhibit 1 was not an entry of default.

Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff asserted Exhibit 3 was a 'formal Certificate of Default'; court found Exhibit 3 was the plaintiff's motion for default, not an entered order.

Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff alleged the lawyer appeared 'without any lawful authority or court approval,' but Exhibit 5 was the lawyer's notice of appearance filed in compliance with rules.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Farag v. Persante et al?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Holt v. Crown Builders, Inc., 627 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)'; court found this authority does not exist. Outcome: Warning.

Why does Farag v. Persante et al matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Warning.

What does the public record establish about Farag v. Persante et al?

Which source supports this Farag v. Persante et al summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.