Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 20, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 15, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesGlenn v. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, et al.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 80/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Glenn v. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, et al.

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

M.D. Florida · Oct 9, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | The memorandum cited a nonexistent case. The Court identified the citation as fake, but the decision does not provide the citation’s name or reporter reference. Counsel filed a memorandum containing at least two AI-generated errors: one citation referred to a nonexistent case, and another cited an existing case that did not contain the quotation attributed to it. Counsel admitted failing to review AI-assisted research before filing. The Court emphasized counsel’s duty to provide accurate citations and found that his apology, client and opposing-counsel notifications, donation of approximately $10,000 in fees to Jacksonville Area Legal Aid, AI-ethics CLE, and revised office procedures were a suitable remedy. No further action was ordered.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in M.D. Florida. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | The memorandum cited a nonexistent case. The Court identified the citation as fake, but the decision does not provide the citation’s name or reporter reference. Counsel filed a memorandum containing at least two AI-generated errors: one citation referred to a nonexistent case, and another cited an existing case that did not contain the quotation attributed to it. Counsel admitted failing to review AI-assisted research before filing. The Court emphasized counsel’s duty to provide accurate citations and found that his apology, client and opposing-counsel notifications, donation of approximately $10,000 in fees to Jacksonville Area Legal Aid, AI-ethics CLE, and revised office procedures were a suitable remedy. No further action was ordered.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in M.D. Florida. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore FLOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtM.D. Florida
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit11th Circuit
DateOct 9, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | The memorandum cited a nonexistent case. The Court identified the citation as fake, but the decision does not provide the citation’s name or reporter reference.
  2. False Quotes: Case Law | The memorandum attributed a quotation to an existing case that did not contain the quoted language. The Court identified the quotation as false, but the decision does not identify the case or citation.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Glenn v. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, et al.?
Fabricated: Case Law | The memorandum cited a nonexistent case. The Court identified the citation as fake, but the decision does not provide the citation’s name or reporter reference. Counsel filed a memorandum containing at least two AI-generated errors: one citation referred to a nonexistent case, and another cited an existing case that did not contain the quotation attributed to it. Counsel admitted failing to review AI-assisted research before filing. The Court emphasized counsel’s duty to provide accurate citations and found that his apology, client and opposing-counsel notifications, donation of approximately $10,000 in fees to Jacksonville Area Legal Aid, AI-ethics CLE, and revised office procedures were a suitable remedy. No further action was ordered.
Why does Glenn v. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in M.D. Florida. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Glenn v. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, et al.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Glenn v. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, et al. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.