Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0FOC1N1Generated November 3, 2026Evidence checked Nov 3, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Rivera v. 292 Madison NY LLC

SC New York · Oct 15, 2026

Jurisdiction
State
Court
SC New York
Record ID
rivera-v-292-madison-ny-llc-2026-10-15
Observed outcome
Order to Show Cause
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | The opposition cited “Tirado v Korbin” as an Appellate Division, First Department discovery case, but the court and plaintiff could not find any such case. The reporter citation instead referred to an unrelated Second Department attorney-disbarment matter. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Order to Show Cause. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Order to Show Cause in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Fabricated Quotes
  • Tort
  • Trial
  • Ordered To Show Cause
AI attribution
Not Established
Recorded tool
No tool named in source
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Order to Show Cause
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
  3. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow