HomeCasesKeefe v. BMakin Film Ltd

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Keefe v. BMakin Film Ltd

SC New York · Apr 24, 2026

NY / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authority

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Cited 'Klapper v. Graziano, 41 Misc 3d 401, 410 (Sup Ct 2013)' and attributed the statement that releases 'are enforceable and are not to be lightly set aside,' but the quoted language does not appear in the opinion. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in SC New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in SC New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtSC New York

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateApr 24, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Cited 'Klapper v. Graziano, 41 Misc 3d 401, 410 (Sup Ct 2013)' and attributed the statement that releases 'are enforceable and are not to be lightly set aside,' but the quoted language does not appear in the opinion.
False Quotes: Case Law | Cited 'Clark v. Velsiplast Corp., 88 A.D.2d 859 (1st Dep't 1982)' and quoted from it, but the citation is incorrect (actual case is People v Ford, 88 A.D.2d 859) and the quoted language does not appear.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited 'Shah v. Levy, 56 A.D.3d 574 (2d Dep't 2008)' for a proposition unrelated to that action; citation misrepresents the authority's relevance.
Fabricated: Case Law | Submission contained numerous other phantom cases and lengthy fabricated quotes generated by AI, as noted by the court.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Keefe v. BMakin Film Ltd?: False Quotes: Case Law | Cited 'Klapper v. Graziano, 41 Misc 3d 401, 410 (Sup Ct 2013)' and attributed the statement that releases 'are enforceable and are not to be lightly set aside,' but the quoted language does not appear in the opinion. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Keefe v. BMakin Film Ltd matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in SC New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Keefe v. BMakin Film Ltd?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Keefe v. BMakin Film Ltd summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Ellen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund SocietySC New York · Apr 3, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Sharei Torah v. HendelSC New York · Jun 1, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Cassata v. Michael Macrina Architect, P.C.SC New York · Jan 27, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Matter of MatosSC New York · Nov 13, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Ader v AderSC New York · Oct 1, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Augustin v. Formula 3 Brooklyn Inc.SC New York · Jul 16, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in SC New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Cited 'Clark v. Velsiplast Corp., 88 A.D.2d 859 (1st Dep't 1982)' and quoted from it, but the citation is incorrect (actual case is People v Ford, 88 A.D.2d 859) and the quoted language does not appear.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited 'Shah v. Levy, 56 A.D.3d 574 (2d Dep't 2008)' for a proposition unrelated to that action; citation misrepresents the authority's relevance.

Fabricated: Case Law | Submission contained numerous other phantom cases and lengthy fabricated quotes generated by AI, as noted by the court.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Keefe v. BMakin Film Ltd?

Why does Keefe v. BMakin Film Ltd matter for legal AI risk?

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in SC New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

What does the public record establish about Keefe v. BMakin Film Ltd?

Which source supports this Keefe v. BMakin Film Ltd summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.