HomeCasesAve. Capital Group, LLC v. Strum

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Ave. Capital Group, LLC v. Strum

SC New York · Feb 9, 2026

NY / stateEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsfabricated quotestorttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found counsel included a non-existent case citation in his memorandum and ordered show-cause re sanctions. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Court found counsel included a non-existent case citation in his memorandum and ordered show-cause re sanctions. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found counsel included a non-existent (or incorrectly cited) Risucci decision; plaintiffs located a differently cited Risucci case that did not contain the quoted language. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant's memorandum cited a non-existent case 'Kennedy v Kennedy, 192 AD3d 111 (1st Dept 2020)'; court found the case does not exist and ordered counsel to show cause why he should not be sanctioned. || False Quotes: Case Law | Defendant's brief cited 'Risucci v Homayoon, 122 AD3d 700 (2nd Dept 2014)' and quoted language; plaintiffs located a differently cited Risucci (122 AD2d 260 (2d Dept 1986)) and the quoted language does not appear in that opinion, indicating a false quotation or misrepresentation.
Why it matters now: Every cited case must be pulled from Westlaw/Lexis by a human before filing; no AI-generated citation gets a pass.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found counsel included a non-existent case citation in his memorandum and ordered show-cause re sanctions. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.

Operational lesson

Every cited case must be pulled from Westlaw/Lexis by a human before filing; no AI-generated citation gets a pass.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtSC New York

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateFeb 9, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeOrder to Show Cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Order to Show Cause

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found counsel included a non-existent case citation in his memorandum and ordered show-cause re sanctions.
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found counsel included a non-existent (or incorrectly cited) Risucci decision; plaintiffs located a differently cited Risucci case that did not contain the quoted language.
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant's memorandum cited a non-existent case 'Kennedy v Kennedy, 192 AD3d 111 (1st Dept 2020)'; court found the case does not exist and ordered counsel to show cause why he should not be sanctioned.
False Quotes: Case Law | Defendant's brief cited 'Risucci v Homayoon, 122 AD3d 700 (2nd Dept 2014)' and quoted language; plaintiffs located a differently cited Risucci (122 AD2d 260 (2d Dept 1986)) and the quoted language does not appear in that opinion, indicating a false quotation or misrepresentation.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ave. Capital Group, LLC v. Strum?: Fabricated: Case Law | Court found counsel included a non-existent case citation in his memorandum and ordered show-cause re sanctions. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
Why does Ave. Capital Group, LLC v. Strum matter for legal AI risk?: Every cited case must be pulled from Westlaw/Lexis by a human before filing; no AI-generated citation gets a pass.
What does the public record establish about Ave. Capital Group, LLC v. Strum?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Ave. Capital Group, LLC v. Strum summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Cassata v. Michael Macrina Architect, P.C.SC New York · Jan 27, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Keefe v. BMakin Film LtdSC New York · Apr 24, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Polanco v. Brooklyn Rose LLCSC New York · Jun 16, 2026same court · fake citations + tort Sharei Torah v. HendelSC New York · Jun 1, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Gully v VargheseSC New York · May 12, 2026same court · fake citations + tort Espinoza v. M&R Const. Group Inc.SC New York · Mar 19, 2026same court · fake citations + tort

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtSC New York

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateFeb 9, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeOrder to Show Cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found counsel included a non-existent case citation in his memorandum and ordered show-cause re sanctions.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found counsel included a non-existent (or incorrectly cited) Risucci decision; plaintiffs located a differently cited Risucci case that did not contain the quoted language.

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant's memorandum cited a non-existent case 'Kennedy v Kennedy, 192 AD3d 111 (1st Dept 2020)'; court found the case does not exist and ordered counsel to show cause why he should not be sanctioned.

False Quotes: Case Law | Defendant's brief cited 'Risucci v Homayoon, 122 AD3d 700 (2nd Dept 2014)' and quoted language; plaintiffs located a differently cited Risucci (122 AD2d 260 (2d Dept 1986)) and the quoted language does not appear in that opinion, indicating a false quotation or misrepresentation.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ave. Capital Group, LLC v. Strum?

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found counsel included a non-existent case citation in his memorandum and ordered show-cause re sanctions. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.

Why does Ave. Capital Group, LLC v. Strum matter for legal AI risk?

Every cited case must be pulled from Westlaw/Lexis by a human before filing; no AI-generated citation gets a pass.

What does the public record establish about Ave. Capital Group, LLC v. Strum?

Which source supports this Ave. Capital Group, LLC v. Strum summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.