Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CONSEQUENCE EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-0NYUYZKGenerated October 27, 2026Evidence checked Oct 26, 2026
CONSEQUENCE EVIDENCE REPORT

Case Dismissed

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records122
Source linked100%
Known USD amount total$206,771
Recorded rangeMay 8, 2023 – Oct 7, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What issues appear in matters recording Case Dismissed?

Taxonomy definition: Dismissal of a claim, appeal, filing, or matter is recorded as a case-level consequence.

AI Vortex currently links 122 source-linked public matters that record Case Dismissed. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (99), Misrepresented authority (57) and Fabricated or altered quotations (31). Recorded responses and outcomes include Dismissal or adverse disposition (122), Monetary sanction (28) and Bar or professional referral (9). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the consequence.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 122
Oct 7, 2026Tapscott v. FarissCA IowaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Oct 7, 2026Washington v. JusticeCA Florida (2d)AI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 15, 2026Beard v. Frasier et al.E.D. MissouriNo tool named in sourceSource
Sep 1, 2026Willie C. Fortune v. CTA Certified TransmissionMissouri CANo tool named in sourceSource
Aug 31, 2026Heung Long Sang v Wong Mei YuenDistrict CourtNo tool named in sourceSource
Aug 27, 2026I OSK 935/26NSAAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 18, 2026Kourradi v. ChristopherCA TexasNo tool named in sourceSource
Aug 6, 2026Isles v. Family DollarCA ArizonaNo tool named in sourceSource
Aug 4, 2026Whitehead v. MooreCA MissouriNo tool named in sourceSource
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

Cite this page

Bluebook

AI Vortex, Case Dismissed Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 26, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/consequences/case-dismissed/report (last visited Oct. 26, 2026).

APA

AI Vortex. (2026, October 26). Case Dismissed Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/consequences/case-dismissed/report

URL

https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/consequences/case-dismissed/report (accessed 2026-10-26)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.