Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 12, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 10, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/failure modes/Fake Citations
Source-linked corpus view

Fake Citations

Fake Citations appears in 1,727 of 2,039 public corpus records (84.7%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

Matched records1,727
Corpus denominator2,039
Source linked99.9%
Latest trackedSep 10, 2026
Evidence-based answer

Where does Fake Citations appear and what responses are recorded?

Taxonomy definition: Authorities or citations recorded as nonexistent, inaccurate, or not locatable in the cited form.

AI Vortex currently links 1,727 source-linked public matters classified with Fake Citations. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (1,727), Misrepresented authority (724) and Fabricated or altered quotations (543). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (561), No adjudicated consequence recorded (541) and Monetary sanction (391). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the failure.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalFabricated authorities1,727 records
Leading recorded responseWarning or admonishment561 records
Known numeric amounts$1,723,681212 known · 179 unquantified
Recorded date rangeApr 14, 2023through Sep 10, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 24 of 1,727 matching records.

Ulysse v. Vineland Investment Partners Phase II, LLCCA Florida (6d) · FL · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 10, 2026
Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.D. Utah · UT · ClearBrief, Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini
Sep 9, 2026
Asiedu v. EastlundCA Minnesota · MN · Unidentified
Sep 8, 2026
G.P. v. Jose Hernandez ArevaloW.D. Washington · WA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 8, 2026
Philippeaux v. United States, et al.S.D. New York · NY · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 8, 2026
State ex rel. Steven Schnell v. Honorable Rebecca RichardsonCA Missouri · MO · Unidentified
Sep 8, 2026
Douglas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyD.C. Court of Appeals · US · Google AI
Sep 3, 2026
Santos v. Hoboken Public School District, et al.D. New Jersey · NJ · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 3, 2026
Morgan Cole v. Hobby Town Unlimited, Inc.C.D. Illinois · IL · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 2, 2026
Vijay Ghanshyam Gadiya v. Union of India & Anr.Supreme Court of India · India · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 2, 2026
Willie C. Fortune v. CTA Certified TransmissionMissouri CA · MO · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 1, 2026
Woodley v. GottschallSC Pennsylvania · PA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 1, 2026
Fleming v. The Owners, Strata Plan LMS 4383CRT British Columbia · Canada · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 31, 2026
Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services ex rel. Shona L. Williams v. Samuel R. Lee, IICA Illinois · IL · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 31, 2026
State of Hawaii v. Cody PrestiICA Hawaii · HI · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 31, 2026
Charlie Reyes v. Bryce Bailey, et al.D. New Mexico · NM · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 28, 2026
Erin Booker v. The Kroger Co.N.D. Georgia · GA · Unidentified
Aug 28, 2026
Sanja Noble v. WMC Mortgage Corp. et al.CA Illinois · IL · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 28, 2026
Adams v. Matrix Providers Inc. et al.D. Colorado · CO · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 27, 2026
Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLCS.D. New York · NY · Unidentified
Aug 27, 2026
Paige Kiser & Ty Kiser v. DeSimone Auto Group et al.SC Pennsylvania · PA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 27, 2026
Peter Williams, et al. v. Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Board, et al.N.D. Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 27, 2026
Salloum v. Department of TransportationCA Colorado · CO · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 27, 2026
Thomas Raynard James v. Detective Kevin Conley, et al.S.D. Florida · FL · Unidentified
Aug 27, 2026
Open all matching records

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge’s general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.