Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 12, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 10, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/failure modes/Misrepresented Authority
Source-linked corpus view

Misrepresented Authority

Misrepresented Authority appears in 865 of 2,039 public corpus records (42.4%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

Matched records865
Corpus denominator2,039
Source linked99.7%
Latest trackedSep 9, 2026
Evidence-based answer

Where does Misrepresented Authority appear and what responses are recorded?

Taxonomy definition: Existing authority recorded as used for a proposition, jurisdiction, or rule it does not support.

AI Vortex currently links 865 source-linked public matters classified with Misrepresented Authority. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Misrepresented authority (865), Fabricated authorities (724) and Fabricated or altered quotations (363). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (263), Warning or admonishment (259) and Monetary sanction (211). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the failure.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalMisrepresented authority865 records
Leading recorded responseNo adjudicated consequence recorded263 records
Known numeric amounts$1,349,862134 known · 77 unquantified
Recorded date rangeJun 14, 2023through Sep 9, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 24 of 865 matching records.

Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.D. Utah · UT · ClearBrief, Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini
Sep 9, 2026
Asiedu v. EastlundCA Minnesota · MN · Unidentified
Sep 8, 2026
Carter v. City of BuffaloW.D. New York · NY · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 8, 2026
State ex rel. Steven Schnell v. Honorable Rebecca RichardsonCA Missouri · MO · Unidentified
Sep 8, 2026
Falkenstein v. NilesC.D. California · CA · Unidentified
Sep 3, 2026
Morgan Cole v. Hobby Town Unlimited, Inc.C.D. Illinois · IL · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 2, 2026
Sea Swivel Inc. v. Shuttleslide LLC, et al.S.D. Florida · FL · CoCounsel
Sep 2, 2026
Vijay Ghanshyam Gadiya v. Union of India & Anr.Supreme Court of India · India · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 2, 2026
Willie C. Fortune v. CTA Certified TransmissionMissouri CA · MO · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 1, 2026
Erin Booker v. The Kroger Co.N.D. Georgia · GA · Unidentified
Aug 28, 2026
Estate of Bernie Leynell Nelson v Hurley Medical CenterCA Michigan · MI · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 28, 2026
Peter Williams, et al. v. Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Board, et al.N.D. Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 27, 2026
Varma v. The Bank of New York MellonCal. Ct. App., 4th App. Dist., Div. 2 · US · Unidentified
Aug 27, 2026
Fairrow v. EastenCA Arizona · AZ · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 26, 2026
Krystal Faye Potterf, et al. v. Drew F. Wessels, et al.E.D. Michigan · MI · Unidentified
Aug 26, 2026
MFRD and National Disability Insurance AgencyARTA · Australia · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 26, 2026
Noella P. Turgeon v. FHLMCD. New Hampshire · NH · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 26, 2026
Tyler Shelbert v. Baxter International, Inc.N.D. Illinois · IL · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 26, 2026
AndDone, LLC v. Shante Gaines; Reset Financial Group, LLCW.D. Missouri · MS · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 25, 2026
LPC Commercial Services, LLC v. Ar-Razzaaq Properties, LLCCA Virginia · VA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 25, 2026
Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Abhishek KumarSolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal · GB · Unidentified
Aug 25, 2026
Michael L. Ruiz v. Magellan Financial & Insurance Services (2)D. Arizona · AZ · ChatGPT
Aug 24, 2026
Capital Standard, LLC v. U.S. Bank National AssociationCA Florida (2d) · FL · Unidentified
Aug 21, 2026
Disruptive Resources, LLC v. Ballistic Barrier Products Inc. et al.D. Delaware · DE · Strongsuit
Aug 20, 2026
Open all matching records

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge’s general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.