Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 28, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/failure modes/Misrepresented Authority
Source-linked corpus view

Misrepresented Authority

Misrepresented Authority appears in 960 of 2,223 public corpus records (43.2%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

Matched records960
Corpus denominator2,223
Source linked99.6%
Latest trackedOct 22, 2026
Evidence-based answer

Where does Misrepresented Authority appear and what responses are recorded?

Taxonomy definition: Existing authority recorded as used for a proposition, jurisdiction, or rule it does not support.

AI Vortex currently links 960 source-linked public matters classified with Misrepresented Authority. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Misrepresented authority (960), Fabricated authorities (783) and Fabricated or altered quotations (407). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (308), Warning or admonishment (275) and Monetary sanction (219). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the failure.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalMisrepresented authority960 records
Leading recorded responseNo adjudicated consequence recorded308 records
Known USD amounts$1,230,958.23125 known · 94 unquantified
Recorded date rangeJun 14, 2023through Oct 22, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 24 of 960 matching records.

Johnny Tyson II v. Warren Inn Haltom City Ltd. d/b/a Acacia ApartmentsCA Texas (2d) · TX · No tool named in source
Oct 22, 2026
Ocean Wave Drywall Ltd. v. JohalBC CRT · Canada · No tool named in source
Oct 22, 2026
Moore v. Jackson Walker LLP, et al.S.D. Texas · TX · No tool named in source
Oct 21, 2026
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and National Treasury Employees Union, 74 FLRA No. 87Federal Labor Relations Authority · US · AI (implied, unspecified)
Oct 21, 2026
Commonwealth v. ButlerSC Pennsylvania · PA · No tool named in source
Oct 19, 2026
Waushara County v. Beatrice BruningCA Wisconsin · WI · No tool named in source
Oct 15, 2026
Davis v. Tressler and YorkCA Indiana · IN · No tool named in source
Oct 14, 2026
Sabatini v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionC. Pennsylvania · PA · No tool named in source
Oct 14, 2026
Thornton v. Amazon.com Services LLCE.D. California · CA · No tool named in source
Oct 13, 2026
Avargil et al. v. Yaakov et al.MC Nof HaGalil-Nazareth · Israel · Unidentified
Oct 8, 2026
In the Matter of Gary Brown, Jr.AC Maryland · MD · No tool named in source
Oct 8, 2026
Butler v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanySC Connecticut · CT · No tool named in source
Oct 7, 2026
Kid International, LLC v. City National Bank of FloridaCA Florida (4d) · FL · Unidentified
Oct 7, 2026
Smith v. Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe Local BoardCA Arizona · AZ · AI (implied, unspecified)
Oct 6, 2026
Cooper v. John Doe County Court Clerk et al.S.D. New York · NY · No tool named in source
Oct 5, 2026
Grobler v. Kentucky Housing CorporationCA Kentucky · KY · AI (implied, unspecified)
Oct 2, 2026
Mercante v. TarziaE.D. New York · NY · Westlaw AI
Oct 2, 2026
Droit de la famille — 261553CA Québec · Canada · AI (implied, unspecified)
Oct 1, 2026
P. M. M. c/ G. A., F. M. d. S.H. s/ cobro ordinario de sumas de dineroCA Morón · Argentina · No tool named in source
Oct 1, 2026
Sanchez v. Synchrony Bank N.A.S.D. California · CA · No tool named in source
Oct 1, 2026
Miller v. Colorado Department of RevenueD. Colorado · CO · No tool named in source
Sep 30, 2026
Nantongo v. Nationwide Mortgage Bankers Inc.E.D. New York · NY · No tool named in source
Sep 30, 2026
Sexton v. Department of Homeless Services, et al.S.D. New York · NY · No tool named in source
Sep 30, 2026
United States v. Charles Randall SorensenD. Minnesota · MN · No tool named in source
Sep 30, 2026
Open all matching records

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge’s general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.