Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 12, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 10, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/failure modes/Fabricated Quotes
Source-linked corpus view

Fabricated Quotes

Fabricated Quotes appears in 669 of 2,039 public corpus records (32.8%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

Matched records669
Corpus denominator2,039
Source linked99.4%
Latest trackedSep 3, 2026
Evidence-based answer

Where does Fabricated Quotes appear and what responses are recorded?

Taxonomy definition: Quoted text recorded as absent from, altered from, or unsupported by the cited material.

AI Vortex currently links 669 source-linked public matters classified with Fabricated Quotes. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated or altered quotations (669), Fabricated authorities (543) and Misrepresented authority (363). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (214), No adjudicated consequence recorded (174) and Monetary sanction (169). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the failure.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalFabricated or altered quotations669 records
Leading recorded responseWarning or admonishment214 records
Known numeric amounts$1,105,920122 known · 47 unquantified
Recorded date rangeJun 14, 2023through Sep 3, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 24 of 669 matching records.

Falkenstein v. NilesC.D. California · CA · Unidentified
Sep 3, 2026
Erin Booker v. The Kroger Co.N.D. Georgia · GA · Unidentified
Aug 28, 2026
Adams v. Matrix Providers Inc. et al.D. Colorado · CO · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 27, 2026
Varma v. The Bank of New York MellonCal. Ct. App., 4th App. Dist., Div. 2 · US · Unidentified
Aug 27, 2026
Krystal Faye Potterf, et al. v. Drew F. Wessels, et al.E.D. Michigan · MI · Unidentified
Aug 26, 2026
Noella P. Turgeon v. FHLMCD. New Hampshire · NH · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 26, 2026
AndDone, LLC v. Shante Gaines; Reset Financial Group, LLCW.D. Missouri · MS · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 25, 2026
Kurelko v. BallardD. New Jersey · NJ · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 25, 2026
LPC Commercial Services, LLC v. Ar-Razzaaq Properties, LLCCA Virginia · VA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 25, 2026
Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Abhishek KumarSolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal · GB · Unidentified
Aug 25, 2026
Jack Ferm v. Agritech Properties, et al.D. Utah · UT · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 24, 2026
Michael L. Ruiz v. Magellan Financial & Insurance Services (2)D. Arizona · AZ · ChatGPT
Aug 24, 2026
Capital Standard, LLC v. U.S. Bank National AssociationCA Florida (2d) · FL · Unidentified
Aug 21, 2026
Unspecified murder appeal (Las Cruces area)New Mexico SC · NM · ChatGPT
Aug 21, 2026
Cecile Kasengela v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, et al.C.D. California · CA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 20, 2026
Michael Dotson v. Bob Evans Farms, LLCC.D. California · CA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 20, 2026
Perez v. Schaal, et al.SC California · CA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 20, 2026
Stephen Lohbeck v. Amazon.com Services, LLCE.D. California · CA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 20, 2026
In re the Marriage of Kira Lindsay and Jamie Alexander DillonCA California · CA · Unidentified
Aug 19, 2026
Kelly v. Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityD. Nevada · NV · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 19, 2026
Snisko v. Cascade Funding Mortgage Trust HB4N.D. Illinois · IL · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 19, 2026
Boettcher v. BoettcherCA Arizona · AZ · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 14, 2026
Davis v. Gopal, Didyuk, and Methodist Healthcare-Memphis HospitalsShelby County Circuit Court, Tenn. · US · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 14, 2026
Guerra-Quezada v. United States; Guerra-Vasquez v. United States (consolidated)5th Cir. CA · US · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 14, 2026
Open all matching records

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge’s general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.