COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

CA California (4d)

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records6

Source linked100%

Known USD amount total$2,000

Recorded rangeJun 23, 2026 – Aug 27, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in CA California (4d)?

AI Vortex currently links 6 source-linked public matters associated with CA California (4d). The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated or altered quotations (6), Misrepresented authority (6) and Fabricated authorities (3). Recorded responses and outcomes include Bar or professional referral (3), Monetary sanction (3) and No adjudicated consequence recorded (2). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated or altered quotations6 · 100%Misrepresented authority6 · 100%Fabricated authorities3 · 50%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Bar or professional referral3 · 50%Monetary sanction3 · 50%No adjudicated consequence recorded2 · 33.3%Professional discipline1 · 16.7%Warning or admonishment1 · 16.7%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Lawyer3 · 50%Pro Se Litigant3 · 50%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Contract4 · 66.7%Other1 · 16.7%Tort1 · 16.7%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 6 of 6

Aug 27, 2026Varma v. The Bank of New York MellonCA California (4d)UnidentifiedSource

Aug 11, 2026Suva v. SuvaCA California (4d)No tool named in sourceSource

Jul 14, 2026Thompson v. County of San DiegoCA California (4d)Lexis+ with ProtégéSource

Jul 10, 2026Del Biaggio v. BansenCA California (4d)UnidentifiedSource

Jul 2, 2026Patterson v. Nuvision Credit UnionCA California (4d)UnidentifiedSource

Jun 23, 2026Trina R. Patterson v. Digital Federal Credit UnionCA California (4d)AI (implied, unspecified)Source

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States6 shared records Misrepresented Authority6 shared records Fabricated Quotes6 shared records California6 shared records Fake Citations3 shared records Monetary3 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, CA California (4d) Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 27, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/ca-california-4d/report (last visited Oct. 27, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 27). CA California (4d) Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 27, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/ca-california-4d/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/ca-california-4d/report (accessed 2026-10-27)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.