COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

D. Maryland

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records19

Source linked100%

Known USD amount totalNone recorded

Recorded rangeSep 19, 2025 – Sep 29, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in D. Maryland?

AI Vortex currently links 19 source-linked public matters associated with D. Maryland. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (16), Misrepresented authority (9) and Fabricated or altered quotations (7). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (10), No adjudicated consequence recorded (7) and Dismissal or adverse disposition (1). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities16 · 84.2%Misrepresented authority9 · 47.4%Fabricated or altered quotations7 · 36.8%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Warning or admonishment10 · 52.6%No adjudicated consequence recorded7 · 36.8%Dismissal or adverse disposition1 · 5.3%Order to show cause1 · 5.3%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Lawyer10 · 52.6%Pro Se Litigant9 · 47.4%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Contract7 · 36.8%Civil Rights4 · 21.1%Employment4 · 21.1%Administrative1 · 5.3%Criminal1 · 5.3%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 19

Sep 29, 2026Curran v. Mom's Organic Market, Inc. et al.D. MarylandNo tool named in sourceSource

Aug 26, 2026Darrin L. Johnson, Jr. v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al.D. MarylandNo tool named in sourceSource

Jul 28, 2026Campbell v. TidalHealth, Inc.D. MarylandUnidentifiedSource

Jul 17, 2026Abybatou Mbow v. Officer Michael Mackert et al. (2)D. MarylandNo tool named in sourceSource

Jul 13, 2026Paige Warthen v. Barclays Bank Delaware (Warthen I, II, III)D. MarylandUnidentifiedSource

May 4, 2026Devin A. Robinson v. Velosio, LLCD. MarylandNo tool named in sourceSource

May 1, 2026Yasmani Gurri Rubio v. Markwayne Mullin, et al.D. MarylandUnidentifiedSource

Apr 30, 2026Darrin L. Johnson, Jr. v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, et al.D. MarylandAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Apr 29, 2026Jane Doe v. Baltimore City Board of School CommissionersD. MarylandNo tool named in sourceSource

Apr 27, 2026Ali Behroz Aziz, et al. v. United States of America, et al.D. MarylandAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jan 28, 2026Abybatou Mbow v. Officer Michael Mackert et al. (1)D. MarylandUnidentifiedSource

Jan 23, 2026Future Field Solutions v. NordstrandD. MarylandAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States19 shared records Maryland19 shared records Fake Citations16 shared records Warning10 shared records Misrepresented Authority9 shared records None Adjudicated7 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, D. Maryland Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 26, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/d-maryland/report (last visited Oct. 26, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 26). D. Maryland Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/d-maryland/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/d-maryland/report (accessed 2026-10-26)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.