Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 26, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/recorded consequences/None Adjudicated
Source-linked corpus view

None Adjudicated

None Adjudicated appears in 755 of 2,215 public corpus records (34.1%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

Matched records755
Corpus denominator2,215
Source linked99.6%
Latest trackedOct 22, 2026
Evidence-based answer

What issues appear in matters recording None Adjudicated?

Taxonomy definition: The source records an allegation, dispute, or procedural reference, but the structured record does not identify an adjudicated consequence.

AI Vortex currently links 755 source-linked public matters that record None Adjudicated. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (612), Misrepresented authority (303) and Fabricated or altered quotations (202). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (755), Warning or admonishment (10) and Dismissal or adverse disposition (5). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the consequence.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalFabricated authorities612 records
Leading recorded responseNo adjudicated consequence recorded755 records
Known USD amounts$12,5002 known · 0 unquantified
Recorded date rangeMay 29, 2023through Oct 22, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 24 of 755 matching records.

Johnny Tyson II v. Warren Inn Haltom City Ltd. d/b/a Acacia ApartmentsCA Texas (2d) · TX · No tool named in source
Oct 22, 2026
Chilingarian v. Blanche10th Cir. CA · US · No tool named in source
Oct 20, 2026
Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Gstaad Hotels Private LimitedSupreme Court · India · Unidentified
Oct 15, 2026
Deen v. VMK, Inc.CA California (6d) · CA · No tool named in source
Oct 13, 2026
King v. AT&T Corp. et al.W.D. Washington · WA · No tool named in source
Oct 13, 2026
Cox v. Mitchell5th Cir. CA · US · Unidentified
Oct 9, 2026
Glenn v. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, et al.M.D. Florida · FL · Unidentified
Oct 9, 2026
U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee of the Chalet Series IV Trust v. Rosy Esprecion ThomasHawaii ICA · HI · No tool named in source
Oct 8, 2026
Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services ex rel. Shaina Matos v. Daniel BadeaCA Illinois (1d) · IL · No tool named in source
Oct 7, 2026
In re Alexis Lorene LandrumCA Texas (5d) · TX · No tool named in source
Oct 7, 2026
Grobler v. Kentucky Housing CorporationCA Kentucky · KY · AI (implied, unspecified)
Oct 2, 2026
MeetingTV, Inc. v. KOI Security Inc. et al.S.D. California · CA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Oct 2, 2026
Mercante v. TarziaE.D. New York · NY · Westlaw AI
Oct 2, 2026
FJ v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentFirst-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) · GB · AI (implied, unspecified)
Oct 1, 2026
Jackson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.E.D. Michigan · MI · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 30, 2026
Nantongo v. Nationwide Mortgage Bankers Inc.E.D. New York · NY · No tool named in source
Sep 30, 2026
Zheng Liu v. Lynk Global, Inc.Delaware CC · DE · Unidentified
Sep 30, 2026
Curran v. Mom's Organic Market, Inc. et al.D. Maryland · MD · No tool named in source
Sep 29, 2026
Garcia v. City of Monte Vista, Colorado et al.D. Colorado · CO · Unidentified
Sep 29, 2026
Rhyu v. FrostCA Illinois · IL · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 29, 2026
Tijerino v. Spotify USA Inc.S.D. New York · NY · Lex
Sep 29, 2026
Ahmed v. Minister of Citizenship and ImmigrationFederal Court · Canada · No tool named in source
Sep 28, 2026
The Louisiana Community Development Capital Fund, Inc. et al. v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.M.D. Louisiana · LA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 28, 2026
Coyne v. SmurlLackawanna CCCP · US · No tool named in source
Sep 25, 2026
Open the full analytics view

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge’s general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.