STATE EVIDENCE REPORT

Indiana

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records38

Source linked100%

Known USD amount total$67,476.18

Recorded rangeMay 28, 2025 – Oct 14, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with Indiana?

AI Vortex currently links 38 source-linked public matters associated with Indiana. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (33), Misrepresented authority (21) and Fabricated or altered quotations (10). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (23), Monetary sanction (9) and No adjudicated consequence recorded (5). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities33 · 86.8%Misrepresented authority21 · 55.3%Fabricated or altered quotations10 · 26.3%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Warning or admonishment23 · 60.5%Monetary sanction9 · 23.7%No adjudicated consequence recorded5 · 13.2%Bar or professional referral1 · 2.6%Filing or pleading struck1 · 2.6%Order to show cause1 · 2.6%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant29 · 76.3%Lawyer9 · 23.7%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Other9 · 23.7%Civil Rights6 · 15.8%Contract6 · 15.8%Family5 · 13.2%Administrative4 · 10.5%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 38

Oct 14, 2026Davis v. Tressler and YorkCA IndianaNo tool named in sourceSource

Sep 28, 2026Anderson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.S.D. IndianaUnidentifiedSource

Sep 18, 2026Englert v. Gateway Crossing Property Owners Association, Inc.CA IndianaNo tool named in sourceSource

Sep 17, 2026Risner v. Starke CountyN.D. IndianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Sep 11, 2026Virgil v. Experian Information Solutions, et al.S.D. IndianaNo tool named in sourceSource

Aug 14, 2026Brankle v. SchmellCA IndianaChatGPTSource

Aug 14, 2026Daryl Harris v. Christopher A. WrayS.D. IndianaUnidentifiedSource

Jul 16, 2026Chryshawna A. and Jeremy Webb v. Sullivan County AssessorTax Court IndianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jul 15, 2026Valurie Kaye Mettler v. Michigan State Police et al.CA IndianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jun 22, 2026Hoagland Family Limited Partnership v. Town of Clear LakeCA IndianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jun 16, 2026Holstein v. HolsteinCA IndianaUnidentifiedSource

Jun 10, 2026In re Garcia-MartzN.D. Indiana (Bankruptcy)UnidentifiedSource

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States38 shared records Fake Citations33 shared records Warning23 shared records Misrepresented Authority21 shared records CA Indiana17 shared records S.D. Indiana14 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Indiana Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 26, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/in/report (last visited Oct. 26, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 26). Indiana Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/in/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/in/report (accessed 2026-10-26)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.