Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
STATE EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-1QBKNBVGenerated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
STATE EVIDENCE REPORT

Indiana

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records34
Source linked100%
Known amount total$12,047
Recorded rangeMay 28, 2025 Aug 14, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with Indiana?

AI Vortex currently links 34 source-linked public matters associated with Indiana. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (30), Misrepresented authority (18) and Fabricated or altered quotations (10). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (22), Monetary sanction (6) and No adjudicated consequence recorded (5). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 34
Aug 14, 2026Brankle v. SchmellCA IndianaChatGPTSource
Aug 14, 2026Daryl Harris v. Christopher A. WrayS.D. IndianaUnidentifiedSource
Jul 16, 2026Chryshawna A. and Jeremy Webb v. Sullivan County AssessorTax Court IndianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jul 15, 2026Valurie Kaye Mettler v. Michigan State Police et al.CA IndianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 22, 2026Hoagland Family Limited Partnership v. Town of Clear LakeCA IndianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 16, 2026Holstein v. HolsteinCA IndianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 10, 2026In re Garcia-MartzN.D. Indiana (Bankruptcy)AI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 26, 2026Jean-Paul B. Kalonji v. State of IndianaCA IndianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 26, 2026William C. Maxwell v. Dakota Michael & Chelsey SmithS.D. IndianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Apr 23, 2026Philip D. Dennison v. June Caudill et al.S.D. IndianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Apr 14, 2026Cynthia White v. Walmart, Inc.S.D. IndianaUnidentifiedSource
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.