HomeCasesHolstein v. Holstein

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Holstein v. Holstein

CA Indiana · Jun 16, 2026

IN / stateEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesfamilyappellate

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Initial brief cited a non-existent case (first fictitious citation); counsel later discovered it did not exist and amended the brief. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Admonishment; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in CA Indiana, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Initial brief cited a non-existent case (first fictitious citation); counsel later discovered it did not exist and amended the brief. Outcome: Admonishment.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in CA Indiana, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

IndianaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtCA Indiana

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit7th Circuit

DateJun 16, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeAdmonishment

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Admonishment

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Initial brief cited a non-existent case (first fictitious citation); counsel later discovered it did not exist and amended the brief.
Fabricated: Case Law | Initial brief cited a second non-existent case (second fictitious citation); counsel later discovered it did not exist and amended the brief.
False Quotes: Case Law | Initial brief attributed a quotation to an existing case that was not accurate (misattributed/false quotation); counsel corrected the brief after discovering the error.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Holstein v. Holstein?: Fabricated: Case Law | Initial brief cited a non-existent case (first fictitious citation); counsel later discovered it did not exist and amended the brief. Outcome: Admonishment.
Why does Holstein v. Holstein matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in CA Indiana, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Holstein v. Holstein?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Holstein v. Holstein summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Hoagland Family Limited Partnership v. Town of Clear LakeCA Indiana · Jun 22, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Jean-Paul B. Kalonji v. State of IndianaCA Indiana · May 26, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Nicole Olbera, et al. v. Tiara SykesCA Indiana · Mar 30, 2026same court · fake citations + family Mutugu v. KiarahoCA Indiana · Feb 6, 2026same court · fake citations + family T.M. v. M.M.CA Indiana · Sep 24, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Cingel v. FerreriCA Indiana · Sep 19, 2025same court · fake citations + family

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Initial brief cited a non-existent case (first fictitious citation); counsel later discovered it did not exist and amended the brief. Outcome: Admonishment.

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Initial brief cited a non-existent case (first fictitious citation); counsel later discovered it did not exist and amended the brief.

Fabricated: Case Law | Initial brief cited a second non-existent case (second fictitious citation); counsel later discovered it did not exist and amended the brief.

False Quotes: Case Law | Initial brief attributed a quotation to an existing case that was not accurate (misattributed/false quotation); counsel corrected the brief after discovering the error.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Holstein v. Holstein?

Fabricated: Case Law | Initial brief cited a non-existent case (first fictitious citation); counsel later discovered it did not exist and amended the brief. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why does Holstein v. Holstein matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Holstein v. Holstein?

Which source supports this Holstein v. Holstein summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.