STATE EVIDENCE REPORT

Maryland

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records32

Source linked100%

Known USD amount totalNone recorded

Recorded rangeSep 9, 2025 – Oct 16, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with Maryland?

AI Vortex currently links 32 source-linked public matters associated with Maryland. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (28), Misrepresented authority (16) and Fabricated or altered quotations (12). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (14), No adjudicated consequence recorded (10) and Filing or pleading struck (3). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities28 · 87.5%Misrepresented authority16 · 50%Fabricated or altered quotations12 · 37.5%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Warning or admonishment14 · 43.8%No adjudicated consequence recorded10 · 31.3%Filing or pleading struck3 · 9.4%Bar or professional referral2 · 6.3%Order to show cause2 · 6.3%Professional discipline2 · 6.3%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant16 · 50%Lawyer15 · 46.9%Judge1 · 3.1%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Contract9 · 28.1%Civil Rights4 · 12.5%Employment4 · 12.5%Family4 · 12.5%Administrative3 · 9.4%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 32

Oct 16, 2026Hadarou Sare v. Central Collection Unit, et al.AC MarylandNo tool named in sourceSource

Oct 8, 2026In the Matter of Gary Brown, Jr.AC MarylandNo tool named in sourceSource

Sep 29, 2026Curran v. Mom's Organic Market, Inc. et al.D. MarylandNo tool named in sourceSource

Aug 26, 2026Darrin L. Johnson, Jr. v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al.D. MarylandNo tool named in sourceSource

Aug 25, 2026Benjamin v. StateCA MarylandAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Aug 11, 2026Eyong v. 72 Barrow St. Realty Corp.AC MarylandNo tool named in sourceSource

Jul 28, 2026Campbell v. TidalHealth, Inc.D. MarylandUnidentifiedSource

Jul 20, 2026Khan v. Howard County BAPCA MarylandUnidentifiedSource

Jul 17, 2026Abybatou Mbow v. Officer Michael Mackert et al. (2)D. MarylandNo tool named in sourceSource

Jul 13, 2026Paige Warthen v. Barclays Bank Delaware (Warthen I, II, III)D. MarylandUnidentifiedSource

Jun 16, 2026Olutosin Ajakaiye v. Omowunmi H. OladipupoCA MarylandAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jun 4, 2026Lafaye B. Brown v. James E. Clarke, et al.CA MarylandNo tool named in sourceSource

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States32 shared records Fake Citations28 shared records D. Maryland19 shared records Misrepresented Authority16 shared records Warning14 shared records Fabricated Quotes12 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Maryland Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 26, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/md/report (last visited Oct. 26, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 26). Maryland Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/md/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/md/report (accessed 2026-10-26)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.