Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
AI TOOL EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-1S9N4THGenerated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
AI TOOL EVIDENCE REPORT

NotebookLM

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records1
Source linked100%
Known amount totalNone recorded
Recorded rangeFeb 5, 2026 Feb 5, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What issues and consequences appear in records that identify NotebookLM?

AI Vortex currently links 1 source-linked public matter that identify NotebookLM. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (1), Fabricated or altered quotations (1) and Misrepresented authority (1). Recorded responses and outcomes include Filing or pleading struck (1). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the tool.

This profile currently contains only 1 source-linked record. Patterns are displayed for transparency but are not a stable basis for comparison.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 1 of 1
Feb 5, 2026Flycatcher v. Affable AvenueS.D. New YorkNotebookLM; vLex; Paxton AISource
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.