AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 9, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 6, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/Map
Geographic research

Global legal AI risk map

Move from worldwide country coverage into US state-level clusters, then inspect the synchronized record list. Cluster size represents corpus volume; color represents the highest recorded editorial-impact classification. Neither is an incidence rate.

Case directoryBrowse countriesMethodology
Global evidence map1,868 matched records · 40 mapped countries · geographic clusters synchronize the case list
DashboardSourcesAll matching cases
Global legal AI risk matters by countryZoom with the controls, mouse wheel, or trackpad; drag to pan; then select a country cluster to open its synchronized case list and geographic view. Cluster size represents tracked record count and color represents the highest editorial impact classification.1Tanzania, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low206Canada, 206 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification career-ending1297United States, 1297 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification career-ending1Papua New Guinea, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification medium8Argentina, 8 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification career-ending3Chile, 3 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification career-ending1Kenya, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low1Russian Federation, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high1The Bahamas, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification medium6South Africa, 6 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high10Brazil, 10 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high3Colombia, 3 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high1Costa Rica, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low13France, 13 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification medium1Zimbabwe, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low55Israel, 55 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high2United Arab Emirates, 2 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high1Qatar, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low4South Korea, 4 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low13India, 13 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification medium2Poland, 2 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low2Austria, 2 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low8Germany, 8 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low8Belgium, 8 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high7Netherlands, 7 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high1Portugal, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high8Spain, 8 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high6Ireland, 6 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low7New Zealand, 7 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low97Australia, 97 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification career-ending1China, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low15Italy, 15 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high1Denmark, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high61United Kingdom, 61 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high2Czech Republic, 2 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high1Northern Cyprus (KKTC), 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low1Uganda, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low1Trinidad & Tobago, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high
100%
Zoom, drag, then select a countryZoom 100% · Mode: matter count
Map colorCareer impactHighMediumLowCluster size = tracked record count