Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 29, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/Map
Geographic research

Global legal AI risk map

Move from worldwide country coverage into US state-level clusters, then inspect the synchronized record list. Cluster size represents corpus volume; color represents the highest recorded editorial-impact classification. Neither is an incidence rate.

Global evidence map2,238 matched records · 43 jurisdictions (distinct countries after merging aliases (GB/UK, US/USA), plus Hong Kong and Northern Cyprus) · geographic clusters synchronize the case list
Global legal AI risk matters by countryZoom with the controls, mouse wheel, or trackpad; drag to pan; then select a country cluster to open its synchronized case list and geographic view. Cluster size represents tracked record count and color represents the highest editorial impact classification.2Tanzania, 2 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification career-ending237Canada, 237 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification career-ending1510United States, 1510 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification career-ending1Papua New Guinea, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification medium10Argentina, 10 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification career-ending3Chile, 3 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification career-ending1Kenya, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low1Russian Federation, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification medium1The Bahamas, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification medium7South Africa, 7 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high41Brazil, 41 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high3Colombia, 3 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high8Costa Rica, 8 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high14France, 14 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification medium1Zimbabwe, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low58Israel, 58 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high2United Arab Emirates, 2 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high1Qatar, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low8South Korea, 8 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low16India, 16 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification medium10Poland, 10 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low2Austria, 2 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low11Germany, 11 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low8Belgium, 8 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high7Netherlands, 7 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high1Portugal, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high8Spain, 8 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high6Ireland, 6 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low7New Zealand, 7 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low112Australia, 112 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification career-ending5China, 5 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification medium15Italy, 15 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high2Denmark, 2 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high89United Kingdom, 89 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high2Czech Republic, 2 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high1Northern Cyprus (KKTC), 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low2Uganda, 2 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification low1Trinidad & Tobago, 1 tracked records, highest editorial impact classification high
100%
Zoom, drag, then select a countryZoom 100% · Mode: matter count
Map colorCareer impactHighMediumLowCluster size = tracked record count