Preparing the requested public record.
Source-linked legal AI risk records across cases, courts, and jurisdictions. Built for responsible review and defensible preparation.
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant's memorandum [99] cited Miller v. City of Greenville, 243 So. 2d 81, 83 (Miss. 1971), which the Court could not locate and deemed hallucinatory. Outcome: Revoked pro hac vice; DQ resident attorneys from the case; Monetary Fine; Bar Referrals.
Recorded amount: $8.0KOpen case recordDiscover, search, and inspect source-linked records in the public tracker.
Start searchingAsk questions and turn evidence into citations, summaries, controls, and review-ready packets.
Use the same intelligence beside the case, opinion, filing, or court page you are reading.
Join early accessThe same public record should behave differently for a filing team, chambers, a researcher, or a product operator. Choose the workflow closest to yours.
Run a citation, quotation, proposition-support, and disclosure review with a reusable verification record.
Open the filing gate Court or chambersSeparate demonstrated discrepancies from attribution, preserve source links, and compare similar public matters.
Open neutral review Research and knowledgeSearch the global corpus, inspect the denominator, and open the underlying public evidence before relying.
Explore risk topics Legal tech and riskUse the read-only MCP, dashboards, and structured artifacts as a shared intelligence layer.
Review integration pathsCounts describe tracked public matters, not industry incidence. Failure and consequence tags can overlap. Monetary metrics use only records with a known amount.
Decision month. Corpus-added dates are not recorded. The latest period may be incomplete. Hover for values; click a period to inspect records.
Source-linked, not source-equivalent. A link establishes traceability; it does not make a summary a substitute for the order or docket.
Observed incidents, not failure rates. Counts are not adjusted for product usage, filing volume, or reporting bias.
Neutral attribution. A discrepancy is not proof that AI was used. AI Vortex states the recorded basis and flags what remains unknown.
Inspect methodology, coverage, and limitationsResearch the full public record, inspect sources, and use the MCP for free. The Pro pilot removes packaging friction when you need clean, branded work for a client, court, committee, or team.
Need team seats, procurement support, or a firm-wide pilot? Email for organization pricing.
