Mandy Pecher v Josef Gregor Habscheid,
Michigan CC · Jun 2, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- Michigan CC
- Record ID
- mandy-pecher-v-josef-gregor-habscheid-2025-06-02
- Observed outcome
- Monetary Sanction; Motions denied
- Known monetary consequence
- $800
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple fabricated Michigan Court of Appeals unpublished opinions cited in May 9 and May 20 motions; court found the listed opinions do not exist and attributed their creation to ChatGPT. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Motions denied. As recounted in a subsequent complaint by the Grievance Administrator.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Monetary Sanction; Motions denied. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction; Motions denied in Michigan CC. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Published Opinion
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- ChatGPT
- Known monetary consequence
- $800
- Procedural posture
- Monetary Sanction; Motions denied
Damien Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases Database
Source link missing. No source URL is recorded.
No public source link is currently recorded.
A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. No underlying public source link is currently recorded. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.