Mandy Pecher v Josef Gregor Habscheid,
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0). What AI Vortex adds.
Secondary source, primary not confirmed · checked 2026-11-07
Michigan CC · Jun 2, 2025
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple fabricated Michigan Court of Appeals unpublished opinions cited in May 9 and May 20 motions; court found the listed opinions do not exist and attributed their creation to ChatGPT. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Motions denied. As recounted in a subsequent complaint by the Grievance Administrator.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Monetary Sanction; Motions denied. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction; Motions denied in Michigan CC. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple fabricated Michigan Court of Appeals unpublished opinions cited in May 9 and May 20 motions; court found the listed opinions do not exist and attributed their creation to ChatGPT. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Motions denied. As recounted in a subsequent complaint by the Grievance Administrator.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction; Motions denied in Michigan CC. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Monetary Sanction; Motions denied
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple fabricated Michigan Court of Appeals unpublished opinions cited in May 9 and May 20 motions; court found the listed opinions do not exist and attributed their creation to ChatGPT.
- False Quotes: Legal Norm | Respondent quoted language attributed to MCR 2.603 that does not appear in that rule; court found the quoted text inaccurate and the rule inapplicable to the motion.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Respondent cited Byington v. Byington for the proposition Michigan law requires equitable allocation of tax liabilities and refunds; court found the case exists but does not support that proposition.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Respondent cited Weymers v. Khera as supporting the standard for motions for reconsideration; court found the cited case does not address that standard and does not support the proposition.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple non-existent Michigan appellate decisions cited in an April 30, 2026 Motion for Relief from Judgment; respondent later admitted some of these do not exist in a Notice of Errata.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated Michigan appellate opinion cited in a June 5 motion to set aside an order; court found the case does not exist.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Mandy Pecher v Josef Gregor Habscheid,?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple fabricated Michigan Court of Appeals unpublished opinions cited in May 9 and May 20 motions; court found the listed opinions do not exist and attributed their creation to ChatGPT. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Motions denied. As recounted in a subsequent complaint by the Grievance Administrator.
- Why does Mandy Pecher v Josef Gregor Habscheid, matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction; Motions denied in Michigan CC. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Mandy Pecher v Josef Gregor Habscheid,?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. No underlying public source link is currently recorded. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Mandy Pecher v Josef Gregor Habscheid, summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases Database. It is classified as source link missing; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.