Mandy Pecher v Josef Gregor Habscheid,
Michigan CC · Jun 2, 2025
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple fabricated Michigan Court of Appeals unpublished opinions cited in May 9 and May 20 motions; court found the listed opinions do not exist and attributed their creation to ChatGPT. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Motions denied. As recounted in a subsequent complaint by the Grievance Administrator.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Monetary Sanction; Motions denied. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction; Motions denied in Michigan CC. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple fabricated Michigan Court of Appeals unpublished opinions cited in May 9 and May 20 motions; court found the listed opinions do not exist and attributed their creation to ChatGPT. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Motions denied. As recounted in a subsequent complaint by the Grievance Administrator.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction; Motions denied in Michigan CC. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Monetary Sanction; Motions denied
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple fabricated Michigan Court of Appeals unpublished opinions cited in May 9 and May 20 motions; court found the listed opinions do not exist and attributed their creation to ChatGPT.
- False Quotes: Legal Norm | Respondent quoted language attributed to MCR 2.603 that does not appear in that rule; court found the quoted text inaccurate and the rule inapplicable to the motion.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Respondent cited Byington v. Byington for the proposition Michigan law requires equitable allocation of tax liabilities and refunds; court found the case exists but does not support that proposition.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Respondent cited Weymers v. Khera as supporting the standard for motions for reconsideration; court found the cited case does not address that standard and does not support the proposition.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple non-existent Michigan appellate decisions cited in an April 30, 2026 Motion for Relief from Judgment; respondent later admitted some of these do not exist in a Notice of Errata.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated Michigan appellate opinion cited in a June 5 motion to set aside an order; court found the case does not exist.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Mandy Pecher v Josef Gregor Habscheid,?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple fabricated Michigan Court of Appeals unpublished opinions cited in May 9 and May 20 motions; court found the listed opinions do not exist and attributed their creation to ChatGPT. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Motions denied. As recounted in a subsequent complaint by the Grievance Administrator.
- Why does Mandy Pecher v Josef Gregor Habscheid, matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction; Motions denied in Michigan CC. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Mandy Pecher v Josef Gregor Habscheid,?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. No underlying public source link is currently recorded. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Mandy Pecher v Josef Gregor Habscheid, summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases Database. It is classified as source link missing; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.