Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0NVO0RSGenerated August 17, 2026Evidence checked Aug 17, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Nº 0006113-73.2025.8.16.0033

TJ Parana · Sep 26, 2025

Jurisdiction
international
Court
TJ Parana
Record ID
no-0006113-73-2025-8-16-0033-2025-09-26
Observed outcome
Bar Referral (upheld on appeal)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | Use of a fabricated precedent (attributed to the Superior Tribunal de Justiça, referenced as from 2011) generated by an AI system to support the request for gratuidade da justiça; court noted superficial review would have revealed the falsehood. Outcome: Bar Referral (upheld on appeal).

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies fake citations and bar referral and records Bar Referral (upheld on appeal). The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral (upheld on appeal) in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Bar Referral
  • Other
  • Trial
  • Professional
AI attribution
Not Established
Recorded tool
Unidentified
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Bar Referral (upheld on appeal)
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.