Which source supports this Mercado E Açougue Sao Lucas Eireli v Pluxee Beneficios Brasil summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesMercado E Açougue Sao Lucas Eireli v Pluxee Beneficios Brasil

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

Mercado E Açougue Sao Lucas Eireli v Pluxee Beneficios Brasil

TJ Parana · May 15, 2026

Brazil Editorial impact: high fake citations misrepresented authority bar referral other Monetary Bar Referral

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited judicial precedents that did not exist (jurisprudência inexistente) and were created by artificial intelligence; court treated these as invented case law and grounds for sanction. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies fake citations and misrepresented authority and records Monetary Fine; Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtTJ Parana

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateMay 15, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary Fine; Bar Referral

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionYes

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Monetary Fine; Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited judicial precedents that did not exist (jurisprudência inexistente) and were created by artificial intelligence; court treated these as invented case law and grounds for sanction.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant attributed non-existent content to real precedents (AI-generated quotes/content inconsistent with the actual holdings), undermining the dialectical principle and prejudicing the adversarial process.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Mercado E Açougue Sao Lucas Eireli v Pluxee Beneficios Brasil?: Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited judicial precedents that did not exist (jurisprudência inexistente) and were created by artificial intelligence; court treated these as invented case law and grounds for sanction. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.
Why does Mercado E Açougue Sao Lucas Eireli v Pluxee Beneficios Brasil matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Mercado E Açougue Sao Lucas Eireli v Pluxee Beneficios Brasil?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Mercado E Açougue Sao Lucas Eireli v Pluxee Beneficios Brasil summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Nº 0104033-49.2025.8.16.0000TJ Parana · Apr 8, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Ederaldo Cirino da Luz v. Joaquim Cirino da Luz et al.TJ Parana · Jun 23, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Nº 0006113-73.2025.8.16.0033TJ Parana · Sep 26, 2025same court · fake citations + bar referral N°0035599-44.2017.8.16.0014TJ Parana · Jul 22, 2026same court · fake citations + bar referral Nº 0004948-60.2026.8.16.0031TJ Parana · Jun 12, 2026same court · fake citations + bar referral Manoel Tomaz Budal Filho v. Antonio Carlos Alves LopesTJ Parana · May 25, 2026same court · fake citations + bar referral

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Corpus snapshot checked Aug 17, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Aug 17, 2026; latest tracked decision Aug 13, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open TJ Parana profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology