AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 17, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 13, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesEderaldo Cirino da Luz v. Joaquim Cirino da Luz et al.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Ederaldo Cirino da Luz v. Joaquim Cirino da Luz et al.

TJ Parana · Jun 23, 2026

BrazilEditorial impact: highfake citationsmisrepresented authoritybar referraltrialMonetaryBar Referral
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Citação do 'AgInt no AREsp 1.234.567/PR' apresentada como precedente do STJ; o tribunal afirmou que tal julgamento inexiste (número fabricado). Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and misrepresented authority and records Monetary Fine; Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Citação do 'AgInt no AREsp 1.234.567/PR' apresentada como precedente do STJ; o tribunal afirmou que tal julgamento inexiste (número fabricado). Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtTJ Parana
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJun 23, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMonetary Fine; Bar Referral
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Monetary Fine; Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Citação do 'AgInt no AREsp 1.234.567/PR' apresentada como precedente do STJ; o tribunal afirmou que tal julgamento inexiste (número fabricado).
  2. Misrepresented: Case Law | Invocação do 'REsp 1.733.560/SP' como precedente sobre intimação/nomeação de inventariante; tribunal verificou que o julgado indicado é de origem diversa (REsp 1.733.560/SC) e trata de matéria tributária, não do tema alegado.
  3. Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Alegação de que o art. 623 do CPC exige 'intimação pessoal' do inventariante; o tribunal constatou que o texto do art. 623 não prevê exigência de intimação pessoal.
  4. Misrepresented: Case Law | Citação do agravo autuado sob nº 0041584-21.2026.8.16.0000 como suporte à tese; o tribunal observou que o julgamento referido não trata do tema (intimação/inventário), mostrando uso indevido/inexato do precedente.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ederaldo Cirino da Luz v. Joaquim Cirino da Luz et al.?
Fabricated: Case Law | Citação do 'AgInt no AREsp 1.234.567/PR' apresentada como precedente do STJ; o tribunal afirmou que tal julgamento inexiste (número fabricado). Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.
Why does Ederaldo Cirino da Luz v. Joaquim Cirino da Luz et al. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Ederaldo Cirino da Luz v. Joaquim Cirino da Luz et al.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Ederaldo Cirino da Luz v. Joaquim Cirino da Luz et al. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Mercado E Açougue Sao Lucas Eireli v Pluxee Beneficios BrasilTJ Parana · May 15, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authorityNº 0104033-49.2025.8.16.0000TJ Parana · Apr 8, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authorityFranciely da Silva LuzTJ Parana · Jun 9, 2026same court · fake citations + bar referralNº 0006113-73.2025.8.16.0033TJ Parana · Sep 26, 2025same court · fake citations + bar referralPetry v. Evanlux Esquadrias Ltda.TJ Parana · Jun 24, 2025same court · fake citations + bar referralRodnei Chagas v. Fabricio Petinelli Vieira CoutinhoTJ Parana · Jun 6, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority