Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 17, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 13, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesNº 0006113-73.2025.8.16.0033
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Nº 0006113-73.2025.8.16.0033

TJ Parana · Sep 26, 2025

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Use of a fabricated precedent (attributed to the Superior Tribunal de Justiça, referenced as from 2011) generated by an AI system to support the request for gratuidade da justiça; court noted superficial review would have revealed the falsehood. Outcome: Bar Referral (upheld on appeal).

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and bar referral and records Bar Referral (upheld on appeal). The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral (upheld on appeal) in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Use of a fabricated precedent (attributed to the Superior Tribunal de Justiça, referenced as from 2011) generated by an AI system to support the request for gratuidade da justiça; court noted superficial review would have revealed the falsehood. Outcome: Bar Referral (upheld on appeal).

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral (upheld on appeal) in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtTJ Parana
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateSep 26, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeBar Referral (upheld on appeal)
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Bar Referral (upheld on appeal)

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Use of a fabricated precedent (attributed to the Superior Tribunal de Justiça, referenced as from 2011) generated by an AI system to support the request for gratuidade da justiça; court noted superficial review would have revealed the falsehood.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Nº 0006113-73.2025.8.16.0033?
Fabricated: Case Law | Use of a fabricated precedent (attributed to the Superior Tribunal de Justiça, referenced as from 2011) generated by an AI system to support the request for gratuidade da justiça; court noted superficial review would have revealed the falsehood. Outcome: Bar Referral (upheld on appeal).
Why does Nº 0006113-73.2025.8.16.0033 matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral (upheld on appeal) in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Nº 0006113-73.2025.8.16.0033?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Nº 0006113-73.2025.8.16.0033 summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.