Tan Hai Peng Micheal and another v Tan Cheong Joo and others
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
High Court · Mar 6, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Case A was a non-existent authority created by pairing a genuine case name with the neutral citation of a different real case; the court noted that the name and citation were individually real but did not belong together, and the case did not support the asserted legal proposition. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; No pass-through to clients. Earlier decision in the same case here.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records Monetary Sanction; No pass-through to clients. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and trial with Monetary Sanction; No pass-through to clients in High Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Case A was a non-existent authority created by pairing a genuine case name with the neutral citation of a different real case; the court noted that the name and citation were individually real but did not belong together, and the case did not support the asserted legal proposition. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; No pass-through to clients. Earlier decision in the same case here.
This matter connects fake citations and trial with Monetary Sanction; No pass-through to clients in High Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Monetary Sanction; No pass-through to clients
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Case A was a non-existent authority created by pairing a genuine case name with the neutral citation of a different real case; the court noted that the name and citation were individually real but did not belong together, and the case did not support the asserted legal proposition.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Case B was entirely fictitious: neither its case name nor neutral citation corresponded to an existing case, and it did not support the legal proposition for which it was cited.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Tan Hai Peng Micheal and another v Tan Cheong Joo and others?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Case A was a non-existent authority created by pairing a genuine case name with the neutral citation of a different real case; the court noted that the name and citation were individually real but did not belong together, and the case did not support the asserted legal proposition. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; No pass-through to clients. Earlier decision in the same case here.
- Why does Tan Hai Peng Micheal and another v Tan Cheong Joo and others matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and trial with Monetary Sanction; No pass-through to clients in High Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Tan Hai Peng Micheal and another v Tan Cheong Joo and others?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Tan Hai Peng Micheal and another v Tan Cheong Joo and others summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.