Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
COURT EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-1QYV83BGenerated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 12, 2026
COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

CA Maryland

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records10
Source linked100%
Known amount totalNone recorded
Recorded rangeSep 9, 2025 Aug 25, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in CA Maryland?

AI Vortex currently links 10 source-linked public matters associated with CA Maryland. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (9), Misrepresented authority (5) and Fabricated or altered quotations (4). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (3), Bar or professional referral (2) and Filing or pleading struck (2). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 10 of 10
Aug 25, 2026Benjamin v. StateCA MarylandAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jul 20, 2026Khan v. Howard County BAPCA MarylandAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 16, 2026Olutosin Ajakaiye v. Omowunmi H. OladipupoCA MarylandAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 4, 2026Lafaye B. Brown v. James E. Clarke, et al.CA MarylandAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 20, 2026Brandy Dorsey v. Walter Livramento, IIICA MarylandAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Apr 29, 2026Amparo Trejo v. Miguel Angel Amaya HernandezCA MarylandAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Apr 23, 2026Fatima Meziane v. Abdelouahab AitoucheCA MarylandAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jan 14, 2026Boyd v. LeeCA MarylandAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Oct 29, 2025Mezu v. MezuCA MarylandChatGPTSource
Sep 9, 2025Rotibi v. RealPage, Inc.CA MarylandAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.