Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
COURT EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-0XM7UIGGenerated October 27, 2026Evidence checked Oct 27, 2026
COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

D. New Jersey

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records24
Source linked100%
Known USD amount total$9,000
Recorded rangeJul 23, 2025 – Sep 3, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in D. New Jersey?

AI Vortex currently links 24 source-linked public matters associated with D. New Jersey. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (21), Fabricated or altered quotations (14) and Misrepresented authority (7). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (12), No adjudicated consequence recorded (6) and Bar or professional referral (2). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 24
Sep 3, 2026Santos v. Hoboken Public School District, et al.D. New JerseyNo tool named in sourceSource
Aug 25, 2026Kurelko v. BallardD. New JerseyNo tool named in sourceSource
Jun 26, 2026Peterkin et al v. McIntyre et alD. New JerseyAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 16, 2026K.W. v. Ringwood Board of EducationD. New JerseyAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 8, 2026Sinclair v. Capital One Financial Corp.D. New JerseyAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 12, 2026Zena L. Powell v. The Borough of BergenfieldD. New JerseyAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Mar 26, 2026Baker v. Rastelli Foods LLCD. New JerseyAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Mar 16, 2026Shaquan Pridgen v. Amazon.com Services LLCD. New JerseyAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Mar 5, 2026Lawand Hill v. Sloppy Vinyl, LLC, et al.D. New JerseyNo tool named in sourceSource
Feb 3, 2026Azad Alamgir Kabir v. WebMDD. New JerseyAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

Cite this page

Bluebook

AI Vortex, D. New Jersey Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 27, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/d-new-jersey/report (last visited Oct. 27, 2026).

APA

AI Vortex. (2026, October 27). D. New Jersey Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 27, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/d-new-jersey/report

URL

https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/d-new-jersey/report (accessed 2026-10-27)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.