COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

E.D. Texas

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records16

Source linked100%

Known USD amount total$8,200

Recorded rangeNov 25, 2024 – Sep 18, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in E.D. Texas?

AI Vortex currently links 16 source-linked public matters associated with E.D. Texas. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (14), Fabricated or altered quotations (6) and Misrepresented authority (4). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (6), No adjudicated consequence recorded (5) and Monetary sanction (3). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities14 · 87.5%Fabricated or altered quotations6 · 37.5%Misrepresented authority4 · 25%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Warning or admonishment6 · 37.5%No adjudicated consequence recorded5 · 31.3%Monetary sanction3 · 18.8%Non-monetary order (CLE, community service, apology)2 · 12.5%Dismissal or adverse disposition1 · 6.3%Order to show cause1 · 6.3%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant14 · 87.5%Lawyer2 · 12.5%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Civil Rights3 · 18.8%Contract3 · 18.8%Employment3 · 18.8%Administrative2 · 12.5%Other2 · 12.5%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 16

Sep 18, 2026Woodard v. Texas Family Care Network et al.E.D. TexasNo tool named in sourceSource

Jul 8, 2026John Hurt v. Ampcus, Inc.E.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jun 15, 2026David R. Pete v. Greg Abbott, et al.E.D. TexasCetientSource

Jun 11, 2026McCormick v. Texakoma FinancialE.D. TexasUnidentifiedSource

Apr 16, 2026Laud Essandoh v. Capital One Bank NAE.D. TexasUnidentifiedSource

Mar 2, 2026Fabian Antonio Thomas v. Officer Skylar Sillivent, et al.E.D. TexasNo tool named in sourceSource

Feb 24, 2026Wells Fargo Bank v. Frances W. DeanE.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Feb 18, 2026Shaerica L. Walder v. Experian Information SolutionsE.D. TexasNo tool named in sourceSource

Nov 18, 2025Moorehead v. Goodwill Industries of Northeast TexasE.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Oct 22, 2025Pete v. Facebook Meta PlatformsE.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Oct 10, 2025David R. Pete v. United States Department of Justice, et al.E.D. TexasUnidentifiedSource

Sep 3, 2025Pete v. Houston Methodist HospitalE.D. TexasUnidentifiedSource

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States16 shared records Texas16 shared records Fake Citations14 shared records Fabricated Quotes6 shared records Warning6 shared records None Adjudicated5 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, E.D. Texas Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 26, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/e-d-texas/report (last visited Oct. 26, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 26). E.D. Texas Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/e-d-texas/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/e-d-texas/report (accessed 2026-10-26)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.