AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 25, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesFabian Antonio Thomas v. Officer Skylar Sillivent, et al.
Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.
Corpus matter record

Fabian Antonio Thomas v. Officer Skylar Sillivent, et al.

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

E.D. Texas · Mar 2, 2026

TX / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationscivil rightstrialNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited United States v. Lopez, 817 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2016); the Court found this to be a phantom case that does not exist.

Why the court cared
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited United States v. Lopez, 817 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2016); the Court found this to be a phantom case that does not exist.
Why it matters now
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in E.D. Texas, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited United States v. Lopez, 817 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2016); the Court found this to be a phantom case that does not exist.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in E.D. Texas, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Record details

TexasSingle-state evidence scope
Explore TXOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtE.D. Texas
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit5th Circuit
DateMar 2, 2026
NO
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited United States v. Lopez, 817 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2016); the Court found this to be a phantom case that does not exist.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Fabian Antonio Thomas v. Officer Skylar Sillivent, et al.?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited United States v. Lopez, 817 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2016); the Court found this to be a phantom case that does not exist.
Why does Fabian Antonio Thomas v. Officer Skylar Sillivent, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in E.D. Texas, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
What does the public record establish about Fabian Antonio Thomas v. Officer Skylar Sillivent, et al.?
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Fabian Antonio Thomas v. Officer Skylar Sillivent, et al. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

David R. Pete v. Greg Abbott, et al.E.D. Texas · Jun 15, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsBoggess v. ChamnessE.D. Texas · Apr 1, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsWoodard v. Texas Family Care Network et al.E.D. Texas · Sep 18, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsShaerica L. Walder v. Experian Information SolutionsE.D. Texas · Feb 18, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsJohn Hurt v. Ampcus, Inc.E.D. Texas · Jul 8, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsWells Fargo Bank v. Frances W. DeanE.D. Texas · Feb 24, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.