Which source supports this Fabian Antonio Thomas v. Officer Skylar Sillivent, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesFabian Antonio Thomas v. Officer Skylar Sillivent, et al.

Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.

Corpus matter record

Fabian Antonio Thomas v. Officer Skylar Sillivent, et al.

E.D. Texas · Mar 2, 2026

TX / federal Editorial impact: low pro se fake citations civil rights trial None Adjudicated

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited United States v. Lopez, 817 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2016); the Court found this to be a phantom case that does not exist.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited United States v. Lopez, 817 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2016); the Court found this to be a phantom case that does not exist.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in E.D. Texas, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited United States v. Lopez, 817 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2016); the Court found this to be a phantom case that does not exist.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in E.D. Texas, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Record details

TexasSingle-state evidence scope

Explore TXOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtE.D. Texas

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit5th Circuit

DateMar 2, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited United States v. Lopez, 817 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2016); the Court found this to be a phantom case that does not exist.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Fabian Antonio Thomas v. Officer Skylar Sillivent, et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited United States v. Lopez, 817 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2016); the Court found this to be a phantom case that does not exist.
Why does Fabian Antonio Thomas v. Officer Skylar Sillivent, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in E.D. Texas, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
What does the public record establish about Fabian Antonio Thomas v. Officer Skylar Sillivent, et al.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Fabian Antonio Thomas v. Officer Skylar Sillivent, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Boggess v. ChamnessE.D. Texas · Apr 1, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations David R. Pete v. Greg Abbott, et al.E.D. Texas · Jun 15, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations John Hurt v. Ampcus, Inc.E.D. Texas · Jul 8, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Wells Fargo Bank v. Frances W. DeanE.D. Texas · Feb 24, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Shaerica L. Walder v. Experian Information SolutionsE.D. Texas · Feb 18, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Moorehead v. Goodwill Industries of Northeast TexasE.D. Texas · Nov 18, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Evidence-review statusprimary document verified

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Evidence review recorded Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Aug 12, 2026; latest tracked decision Aug 11, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open E.D. Texas profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology