COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

S.D. Ohio

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records12

Source linked100%

Known USD amount total$7,500

Recorded rangeNov 16, 2023 – Jul 29, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in S.D. Ohio?

AI Vortex currently links 12 source-linked public matters associated with S.D. Ohio. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (10), Misrepresented authority (6) and Fabricated or altered quotations (3). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (6), No adjudicated consequence recorded (4) and Filing or pleading struck (1). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities10 · 83.3%Misrepresented authority6 · 50%Fabricated or altered quotations3 · 25%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Warning or admonishment6 · 50%No adjudicated consequence recorded4 · 33.3%Filing or pleading struck1 · 8.3%Monetary sanction1 · 8.3%Ordered explanation1 · 8.3%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant10 · 83.3%Lawyer2 · 16.7%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Contract6 · 50%Civil Rights3 · 25%Employment2 · 16.7%Administrative1 · 8.3%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 12

Jul 29, 2026Terence A. Gragston v. Amazon LLCS.D. OhioAI (implied, unspecified)Source

May 21, 2026Arron v. Custer, et al.S.D. OhioNo tool named in sourceSource

May 15, 2026Brock et al. v. Hamilton County JFS Children Services et al.S.D. OhioAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Mar 31, 2026Quandel Construction Group, Inc. v. Hunt Construction Group, Inc.S.D. OhioNo tool named in sourceSource

Feb 25, 2026Kettering Adventist Healthcare v. Sandra Collier, et al.S.D. OhioAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Feb 18, 2026Kendle Mardis v. Dealer Loyalty Protection, Inc., et al.S.D. OhioAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jan 7, 2026Hector Salvatori v. The Huntington National BankS.D. OhioNo tool named in sourceSource

Oct 7, 2025Jose Villavicencio v. Judge Stephanie MingoS.D. OhioUnidentifiedSource

Sep 11, 2025Calvin Bradley v. Matthew Eichhorn, et al.S.D. OhioAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Aug 19, 2025Lahti v. Consensys Software Inc.S.D. OhioAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jul 3, 2025Muhammad v. Gap Inc.S.D. OhioChatGPTSource

Nov 16, 2023Whaley v. Experian Information SolutionsS.D. OhioUnidentifiedSource

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States12 shared records Ohio12 shared records Fake Citations10 shared records Misrepresented Authority6 shared records Warning6 shared records None Adjudicated4 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, S.D. Ohio Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 26, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/s-d-ohio/report (last visited Oct. 26, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 26). S.D. Ohio Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/s-d-ohio/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/s-d-ohio/report (accessed 2026-10-26)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.