HomeCasesKendle Mardis v. Dealer Loyalty Protection, Inc., et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Kendle Mardis v. Dealer Loyalty Protection, Inc., et al.

S.D. Ohio · Feb 18, 2026

OH / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationscontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Johnson v. Mitchell, 2:20-cv-1882, 2020 WL 5649609 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 23, 2020)'; defendants and the Court found the case does not exist and flagged it as likely AI-generated. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Johnson v. Mitchell, 2:20-cv-1882, 2020 WL 5649609 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 23, 2020)'; defendants and the Court found the case does not exist and flagged it as likely AI-generated.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. Ohio, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. Ohio, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

OhioSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. Ohio

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit6th Circuit

DateFeb 18, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Johnson v. Mitchell, 2:20-cv-1882, 2020 WL 5649609 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 23, 2020)'; defendants and the Court found the case does not exist and flagged it as likely AI-generated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kendle Mardis v. Dealer Loyalty Protection, Inc., et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Johnson v. Mitchell, 2:20-cv-1882, 2020 WL 5649609 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 23, 2020)'; defendants and the Court found the case does not exist and flagged it as likely AI-generated. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Kendle Mardis v. Dealer Loyalty Protection, Inc., et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. Ohio, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Kendle Mardis v. Dealer Loyalty Protection, Inc., et al.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Kendle Mardis v. Dealer Loyalty Protection, Inc., et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Hector Salvatori v. The Huntington National BankS.D. Ohio · Jan 7, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Lahti v. Consensys Software Inc.S.D. Ohio · Aug 19, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Arron v. Custer, et al.S.D. Ohio · May 21, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Brock et al. v. Hamilton County JFS Children Services et al.S.D. Ohio · May 15, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Quandel Construction Group, Inc. v. Hunt Construction Group, Inc.S.D. Ohio · Mar 31, 2026same court · fake citations + contract Kettering Adventist Healthcare v. Sandra Collier, et al.S.D. Ohio · Feb 25, 2026same court · fake citations + contract

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. Ohio, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kendle Mardis v. Dealer Loyalty Protection, Inc., et al.?

Why does Kendle Mardis v. Dealer Loyalty Protection, Inc., et al. matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. Ohio, with the listed outcome: Warning.

What does the public record establish about Kendle Mardis v. Dealer Loyalty Protection, Inc., et al.?

Which source supports this Kendle Mardis v. Dealer Loyalty Protection, Inc., et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.