Item 1Manual review item
Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Local candidate extraction + human verification
Filing integrity review
Extract citation and quotation candidates from pasted text, then document what a reviewer verifies against the primary source. AI Vortex does not determine whether authority is valid or whether AI was used.
0 items0 unresolvedThis tab only
Guardrail: Candidate extraction is not cite checking. A discrepancy is not proof that AI was used. Preserve the filing, inspect the primary source, describe only what can be demonstrated, and escalate proportionally.
1
Not saved yetSet up the review
Do not enter privileged or confidential matter information. Draft state stays only in this browser tab and is removed when the tab closes.
2
Extract candidates
Paste relevant text or load a .txt file. PDFs and DOCX files are not parsed in this release.
What extraction does: identifies reporter-style citations, docket-number patterns, and quotations of 30+ characters. What it does not do: retrieve authority, compare sources, validate pincites, or evaluate proposition support.
3
Verify each candidate
Record the source, exact language, four verification checks, disposition, and notes.
0 unresolved0 confirmed0 resolved0 escalated
4
Prepare a neutral request
Counsel,
We are reviewing the filing. We have not been able to verify the cited language or proposition identified in our review.
Please identify the supporting source text or confirm whether a correction is needed by [date/time]. We are not making assumptions about how any discrepancy arose. Our request is limited to resolving the authority issue before raising it with the Court.
Regards,