Pick the right workflow
Find a task with enough repetition, business value, and reviewability to justify implementation.
Founder-led legal AI implementation
Move one legal workflow from AI interest to controlled use.
Choose the right starting point, define who owns the result, and build the controls that let your team use AI without creating a second layer of unmanaged work.
No sales call required. Qualified requests receive a private Loom within two business days.
Start from the workA real workflow, owner, constraint, and decision.
Control the handoffHuman review stays explicit.
Measure the resultAdoption, time, quality, and exposure.
The implementation problem
The expensive mistake is starting with the tool.
A license does not decide which task should change, where review belongs, what data can enter the system, or how the team knows the new process is better. The engagement starts with those operating decisions.
Define the controls
Set the source checks, escalation rules, ownership, access boundaries, and evidence the reviewer must retain.
Make adoption measurable
Give the team a usable interface, a documented operating path, and a baseline for judging the result.
Two ways to engage
Choose the decision you need to make next.
Start with the Blueprint when the priority is still unclear. Choose the Sprint when your team has authority, budget, and a workflow ready to move.
Legal AI Implementation Blueprint
USD 2,900 · 7–10 business days
A concrete operating plan for the highest-value legal AI opportunity in your team.
- Async intake and current-stack review
- Workflow, friction, and risk map
- Impact, effort, and exposure priority matrix
- Build, buy, or configure recommendation
- Human review and governance gates
- 90-day implementation roadmap
- Written report and private Loom walkthrough
Implementation
From operating plan to working system
Legal AI Implementation Sprint
From USD 8,500 · 4–6 weeks
A founder-led sprint to put up to two priority workflows into controlled use.
- Everything in the Implementation Blueprint
- Design and implementation of up to two workflows
- Tool selection, configuration, or lightweight custom build
- Review controls, documentation, and ownership
- Usable dashboards, interfaces, or working aids
- Async Loom training for the operating team
- Measurement baseline, handoff, and adoption plan
Commercial terms are confirmed after fit and scope. There is no open-ended retainer and no obligation to buy software through AI Vortex.
Proof through shipped work
Inspect the systems, not a logo wall.
The work is visible: research systems, decision interfaces, reports, diagnostics, and operational prototypes. No borrowed case studies and no unnamed client claims.
Legal AI Risk Intelligence
More than 1,800 source-linked matters connected across cases, courts, judges, jurisdictions, tools, patterns, analytics, and print-ready reports.
Open the intelligence layer →AI Visibility Engine
A paid intake, evidence collection, source analysis, prioritized recommendations, secure payment, and measurement flow built around a real buying decision.
Inspect the diagnostic →Operational AI Prototypes
Role-aware legal workspaces, review workflows, decision dashboards, and client-ready systems built to make an operating problem concrete before a larger commitment.
Review the research →
Founder-led from diagnosis to handoff
Work directly with Manu Ayala.
Five years inside a US law firm, plus hands-on work across legal AI research, workflow design, visibility systems, reporting, and product implementation. You will not be handed to a junior delivery team after the sale.
Loom-first process
Get to a real decision without a calendar dance.
The application carries the operating context. The Loom carries the first recommendation. A live conversation happens only when it improves the work.
Apply
Describe the workflow, owner, current stack, budget, and timing.
Receive a Loom
Within two business days, receive a fit decision and proposed scope.
Confirm scope
Resolve open questions asynchronously. Schedule a call only if needed.
Start the work
Payment, kickoff, delivery milestones, and handoff stay documented.
Qualification
A good fit has a decision behind it.
This is built for teams prepared to change how work moves, not for collecting another AI presentation.
This is a fit when…
- A partner, GC, innovation lead, or operator owns the decision.
- A real workflow is slow, inconsistent, expensive, or exposed.
- The team can assign budget, a reviewer, and a delivery window.
- You want an operating path, not a vendor shortlist alone.
This is not a fit when…
- The goal is a free strategy call or speculative proposal.
- No one can own implementation after the recommendation.
- The team wants autonomous legal output without human review.
- The budget or timeline is still entirely hypothetical.
Apply to work together
Show me the workflow that needs to move.
Answer the questions once. I will review the request personally and send a private Loom within two business days if the engagement is a fit.
2 August openings remain.
I reserve no more than two new implementation starts per month.
I reserve no more than two new implementation starts per month.
Application received.
I will review the workflow personally. If it is a fit, expect a private Loom within two business days with a proposed scope and next step. No call is required.
Frequently asked
Before you apply.
Do we need a discovery call?
No. Qualified applicants receive a private Loom within two business days. We schedule a live conversation only when it would materially improve the scope or resolve a decision that cannot be handled asynchronously.
Why start with the Blueprint?
Start there when the team has several possible use cases, conflicting priorities, unclear governance, or uncertainty about whether to build, buy, or configure. The result is an implementation decision and roadmap, not a generic AI strategy deck.
What can the Sprint build?
The exact scope depends on the workflow. It may include a review interface, a controlled drafting or research aid, an intake and triage flow, a verification record, a dashboard, or the integration of an existing tool into a documented operating process.
Do you need client files or internal system access?
Not for the initial Blueprint. Any later access is scoped narrowly, uses the minimum necessary data, and begins only after security and confidentiality requirements are agreed.
Is this limited to law firms?
No. In-house legal, legal operations, courts, legal publishers, and legal technology teams can apply when they have a defined workflow, owner, budget, and delivery window.
What if the request is not a fit?
You will receive a concise answer. I may recommend a smaller diagnostic, a different specialist, an existing product, or waiting until ownership and budget are clearer.