STATE EVIDENCE REPORT

Maine

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records7

Source linked100%

Known USD amount totalNone recorded

Recorded rangeJun 14, 2023 – Sep 18, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with Maine?

AI Vortex currently links 7 source-linked public matters associated with Maine. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (6), Fabricated or altered quotations (5) and Misrepresented authority (4). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (5), Dismissal or adverse disposition (1) and Filing or pleading struck (1). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities6 · 85.7%Fabricated or altered quotations5 · 71.4%Misrepresented authority4 · 57.1%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

No adjudicated consequence recorded5 · 71.4%Dismissal or adverse disposition1 · 14.3%Filing or pleading struck1 · 14.3%Monetary sanction1 · 14.3%Non-monetary order (CLE, community service, apology)1 · 14.3%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant6 · 85.7%Lawyer1 · 14.3%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Contract2 · 28.6%Administrative1 · 14.3%Bankruptcy1 · 14.3%Civil Rights1 · 14.3%Other1 · 14.3%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 7 of 7

Sep 18, 2026In re John Daniel DeaneD. Maine (Bankruptcy)No tool named in sourceSource

Sep 8, 2026Vallee v. LibbySC MaineUnidentifiedSource

Jul 28, 2026Alexander M. v. Frank BisignanoD. MaineNo tool named in sourceSource

May 5, 2026Jessica Fuller v. Hyde School, et al.D. MaineClaude or ChatGPTSource

Oct 27, 2025U.S. Bank National Association v. RichmondD. MaineAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jul 24, 2025Everett J. Prescott, Inc. v. Timothy J. BeallD. MaineUnidentifiedSource

Jun 14, 2023Scott v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationMaine Superior CourtUnidentifiedSource

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States7 shared records Fake Citations6 shared records None Adjudicated5 shared records Fabricated Quotes5 shared records Misrepresented Authority4 shared records D. Maine4 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Maine Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 26, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/me/report (last visited Oct. 26, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 26). Maine Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/me/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/me/report (accessed 2026-10-26)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.