Home/Analytics/data

Corpus analytics

The public record,
measured honestly.

Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.

Dataset snapshot

Inspect provenance before drawing conclusions.

The public corpus records when the source was checked separately from the latest tracked decision. Field coverage varies because court records and source documents do not use a common schema.

Corpus checked: Sep 10, 2026
Latest tracked decision: Sep 8, 2026
Coverage window: Apr 14, 2023 to Sep 8, 2026
Public records: 2,036

Public dataset snapshotChecked Sep 10, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 8, 2026 · 2,036 records · UTF-8

Download CSV Download JSON

Data preview

Inspect the published schema

Open searchable directory

DatePublic matterCourtImpactAmountSource

2026-09-08Asiedu v. EastlundCA MinnesotaMedium$2.3KOpen

2026-09-08Carter v. City of BuffaloW.D. New YorkLow—Open

2026-09-08G.P. v. Jose Hernandez ArevaloW.D. WashingtonLow—Open

2026-09-08Philippeaux v. United States, et al.S.D. New YorkLow—Open

2026-09-08State ex rel. Steven Schnell v. Honorable Rebecca RichardsonCA MissouriMedium$1.8KOpen

2026-09-04Wurm v. Anchor Bay Packaging CorporationE.D. MichiganMedium—Open

2026-09-03Douglas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyD.C. Court of AppealsHigh—Open

2026-09-03Falkenstein v. NilesC.D. CaliforniaMedium—Open

Field coverage

Completeness by field

Missing values remain visible; they are not imputed.

Source link2,032 100%

Court recorded2,035 100%

Decision date2,036 100%

Outcome text1,632 80%

Judge recorded54 3%

Named AI tool222 11%

Known monetary amount235 12%

Source classification

Evidence-link tiers

Classification is based on the recorded URL host.

Publisher document archive1,882 92%

Secondary or other source105 5%

Docket or document mirror28 1%

Official court or government17 1%

Source link missing4 0%

Review coverage

Recorded human-review status

Review status is reported as recorded; missing status is not imputed.

Marked human-reviewed0 0%

Not marked human-reviewed2,036 100%

Source provenance

Source-host concentration

Host counts describe where recorded links point, not source quality by themselves.

Read methodology

HostRecordsShare of corpus

Damiencharlotin.Com1,88292.4%

Reason.Com371.8%

Law.Justia.Com130.6%

Naturalandartificiallaw.Com130.6%

Caselaw.Findlaw.Com50.2%

Govinfo.Gov50.2%

Storage.Courtlistener.Com50.2%

Casemine.Com40.2%

Gao.Gov40.2%

Leagle.Com40.2%

Source Not Linked40.2%

Courtlistener.Com30.1%

Use the case directory to reproduce a filtered view and inspect every named source.

Open complete data table Field definitions and methodology