Home/Analytics/data

Corpus analytics

The public record,
measured honestly.

Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.

Dataset snapshot

Inspect provenance before drawing conclusions.

The public corpus records when the source was checked separately from the latest tracked decision. Field coverage varies because court records and source documents do not use a common schema.

Corpus checked: Oct 9, 2026
Latest tracked decision: Oct 8, 2026
Coverage window: Apr 14, 2023 to Oct 8, 2026
Public records: 2,180

Public dataset snapshotChecked Oct 9, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 8, 2026 · 2,180 records · UTF-8

Download CSV Download JSON

Data preview

Inspect the published schema

Open searchable directory

DatePublic matterCourtImpactAmountSource

2026-10-08In the Matter of Gary Brown, Jr.AC MarylandLow—Open

2026-10-08Thorogood v. Merit Systems Protection BoardFed. Cir.Low—Open

2026-10-07Duckett v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemW.D. WisconsinLow—Open

2026-10-07Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services ex rel. Shaina Matos v. Daniel BadeaCA Illinois (1d)Low—Open

2026-10-07In re Alexis Lorene LandrumCA Texas (5d)Low—Open

2026-10-07Kid International, LLC v. City National Bank of FloridaCA Florida (4d)Low—Open

2026-10-07Tapscott v. FarissCA IowaLow—Open

2026-10-07Washington v. JusticeCA Florida (2d)Low—Open

Field coverage

Completeness by field

Missing values remain visible; they are not imputed.

Source link2,174 100%

Court recorded2,178 100%

Decision date2,180 100%

Outcome text1,727 79%

Judge recorded54 2%

Named AI tool236 11%

Known monetary amount246 11%

Source classification

Evidence-link tiers

Classification is based on the recorded URL host.

Publisher document archive2,018 93%

Secondary or other source111 5%

Docket or document mirror28 1%

Official court or government17 1%

Source link missing6 0%

Review coverage

Recorded human-review status

Review status is reported as recorded; missing status is not imputed.

Marked human-reviewed0 0%

Not marked human-reviewed2,180 100%

Source provenance

Source-host concentration

Host counts describe where recorded links point, not source quality by themselves.

Read methodology

HostRecordsShare of corpus

Damiencharlotin.Com2,01892.6%

Reason.Com371.7%

Law.Justia.Com130.6%

Naturalandartificiallaw.Com130.6%

Source Not Linked60.3%

V.Daum.Net60.3%

Caselaw.Findlaw.Com50.2%

Govinfo.Gov50.2%

Storage.Courtlistener.Com50.2%

Casemine.Com40.2%

Gao.Gov40.2%

Leagle.Com40.2%

Use the case directory to reproduce a filtered view and inspect every named source.

Open complete data table Field definitions and methodology