HomeCasesAmtrust North America o/b/o Justin McGinness v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Amtrust North America o/b/o Justin McGinness v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

SC New Jersey · Mar 27, 2026

NJ / stateEditorial impact: mediumfake citationstrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this non-existent Appellate Division case to support the carrier's right to subrogation against UIM benefits; court found it does not appear in the NJ Superior Court Reports. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Adverse Costs; CLE (recommended).

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary Sanction; Adverse Costs; CLE (recommended); the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Four fabricated NJ cites drew $9K plus recommended CLE — subrogation briefs now warrant supervisor sign-off.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Four fabricated NJ cites drew $9K plus recommended CLE — subrogation briefs now warrant supervisor sign-off.

Record details

New JerseySingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtSC New Jersey

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit3rd Circuit

DateMar 27, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary Sanction; Adverse Costs; CLE (recommended)

Known amount$1,000

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Monetary Sanction; Adverse Costs; CLE (recommended)

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this non-existent Appellate Division case to support the carrier's right to subrogation against UIM benefits; court found it does not appear in the NJ Superior Court Reports.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this nonexistent Law Division decision (and purported affirmance) to support subrogation; court found no record of the case in NJ reports.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this purported 2006 Appellate Division case; court determined the cited authority does not exist in the NJ Superior Court Reports.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this alleged 1971 Law Division decision and its purported affirmance; court found no such opinions in the NJ Superior Court Reports.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Amtrust North America o/b/o Justin McGinness v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company?: Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this non-existent Appellate Division case to support the carrier's right to subrogation against UIM benefits; court found it does not appear in the NJ Superior Court Reports. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Adverse Costs; CLE (recommended).
Why does Amtrust North America o/b/o Justin McGinness v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company matter for legal AI risk?: Four fabricated NJ cites drew $9K plus recommended CLE — subrogation briefs now warrant supervisor sign-off.
What does the public record establish about Amtrust North America o/b/o Justin McGinness v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Amtrust North America o/b/o Justin McGinness v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Peterkin et al v. McIntyre et alD. New Jersey · Jun 26, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + trial K.W. v. Ringwood Board of EducationD. New Jersey · Jun 16, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + trial In re Nicholia Cherry-CrocketteD. New Jersey (Bankruptcy) · May 20, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + trial Zena L. Powell v. The Borough of BergenfieldD. New Jersey · May 12, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + trial Baker v. Rastelli Foods LLCD. New Jersey · Mar 26, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + trial Shaquan Pridgen v. Amazon.com Services LLCD. New Jersey · Mar 16, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Four fabricated NJ cites drew $9K plus recommended CLE — subrogation briefs now warrant supervisor sign-off.

Record details

New JerseySingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtSC New Jersey

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit3rd Circuit

DateMar 27, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary Sanction; Adverse Costs; CLE (recommended)

Known amount$1,000

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this nonexistent Law Division decision (and purported affirmance) to support subrogation; court found no record of the case in NJ reports.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this purported 2006 Appellate Division case; court determined the cited authority does not exist in the NJ Superior Court Reports.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this alleged 1971 Law Division decision and its purported affirmance; court found no such opinions in the NJ Superior Court Reports.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Amtrust North America o/b/o Justin McGinness v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company?

Why does Amtrust North America o/b/o Justin McGinness v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company matter for legal AI risk?

Four fabricated NJ cites drew $9K plus recommended CLE — subrogation briefs now warrant supervisor sign-off.

What does the public record establish about Amtrust North America o/b/o Justin McGinness v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company?

Which source supports this Amtrust North America o/b/o Justin McGinness v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.