Ana Cristina Mendes Sales v. Nemora Elizangela Leite da Silva de Castro
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
Tribunal de Justiça de Rondônia (TJRO) · Sep 17, 2025
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Petition contained citations to judicial precedents that the court found to be invented/nonexistent; court treated these as fabricated precedents without accepting AI-use excuse. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and bar referral and records Monetary Fine; Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in Tribunal de Justiça de Rondônia (TJRO). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Petition contained citations to judicial precedents that the court found to be invented/nonexistent; court treated these as fabricated precedents without accepting AI-use excuse. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.
This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in Tribunal de Justiça de Rondônia (TJRO). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Monetary Fine; Bar Referral
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Petition contained citations to judicial precedents that the court found to be invented/nonexistent; court treated these as fabricated precedents without accepting AI-use excuse.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Ana Cristina Mendes Sales v. Nemora Elizangela Leite da Silva de Castro?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Petition contained citations to judicial precedents that the court found to be invented/nonexistent; court treated these as fabricated precedents without accepting AI-use excuse. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.
- Why does Ana Cristina Mendes Sales v. Nemora Elizangela Leite da Silva de Castro matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in Tribunal de Justiça de Rondônia (TJRO). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Ana Cristina Mendes Sales v. Nemora Elizangela Leite da Silva de Castro?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Ana Cristina Mendes Sales v. Nemora Elizangela Leite da Silva de Castro summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.