HomeCasesAna Cristina Mendes Sales v. Nemora Elizangela Leite da Silva de Castro

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

Ana Cristina Mendes Sales v. Nemora Elizangela Leite da Silva de Castro

Tribunal de Justiça de Rondônia (TJRO) · Sep 17, 2025

Brazil Editorial impact: high fake citations bar referral other trial Monetary Bar Referral

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Petition contained citations to judicial precedents that the court found to be invented/nonexistent; court treated these as fabricated precedents without accepting AI-use excuse. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies fake citations and bar referral and records Monetary Fine; Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in Tribunal de Justiça de Rondônia (TJRO). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in Tribunal de Justiça de Rondônia (TJRO). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtTribunal de Justiça de Rondônia (TJRO)

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateSep 17, 2025

AI toolUnidentified

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary Fine; Bar Referral

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Monetary Fine; Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Petition contained citations to judicial precedents that the court found to be invented/nonexistent; court treated these as fabricated precedents without accepting AI-use excuse.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ana Cristina Mendes Sales v. Nemora Elizangela Leite da Silva de Castro?: Fabricated: Case Law | Petition contained citations to judicial precedents that the court found to be invented/nonexistent; court treated these as fabricated precedents without accepting AI-use excuse. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.
Why does Ana Cristina Mendes Sales v. Nemora Elizangela Leite da Silva de Castro matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in Tribunal de Justiça de Rondônia (TJRO). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Ana Cristina Mendes Sales v. Nemora Elizangela Leite da Silva de Castro?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Ana Cristina Mendes Sales v. Nemora Elizangela Leite da Silva de Castro summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Cartagena v. Dixon, Blackburn, and T.A. Blackburn Law (2)S.D. New York · Jul 10, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: Unidentified LiveVideo.AI Corp. v. RedstoneS.D. New York · Jun 9, 2026fake citations + bar referral Rivera v. Triad Props. Corp.N.D. Alabama · Mar 31, 2026fake citations + bar referral Kaufman v. UptonD. Massachusetts · Jan 21, 2026fake citations + bar referral n.º 5207056-82.2025.8.09.0011TJGO, 8ª Câmara Cível · Dec 9, 2025fake citations + bar referral Apelação Cível nº 1032884-04.2025.8.26.0224TJ San Paulo · Aug 13, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: Unidentified

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Corpus snapshot checked Aug 16, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Aug 16, 2026; latest tracked decision Aug 13, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open Tribunal de Justiça de Rondônia (TJRO) profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology