Casey Dutt v. DGK Roofing and Home, L.L.C.
Ohio CCP · Mar 28, 2025
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited a nonexistent Ohio appellate case for the proposition that misunderstanding legal obligations or procedural confusion constitutes excusable neglect under Civ.R. 60(B). The Court checked the cited reporter location and found it referred instead to Gottfried-Smith v. Gottfried, which did not analyze Civ.R. 60(B). This led to a subsequent complaint before the Ohio Disciplinary Counsel: see here.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and trial with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Ohio CCP. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited a nonexistent Ohio appellate case for the proposition that misunderstanding legal obligations or procedural confusion constitutes excusable neglect under Civ.R. 60(B). The Court checked the cited reporter location and found it referred instead to Gottfried-Smith v. Gottfried, which did not analyze Civ.R. 60(B). This led to a subsequent complaint before the Ohio Disciplinary Counsel: see here.
This matter connects fake citations and trial with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Ohio CCP. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited a nonexistent Ohio appellate case for the proposition that misunderstanding legal obligations or procedural confusion constitutes excusable neglect under Civ.R. 60(B). The Court checked the cited reporter location and found it referred instead to Gottfried-Smith v. Gottfried, which did not analyze Civ.R. 60(B).
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Casey Dutt v. DGK Roofing and Home, L.L.C.?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited a nonexistent Ohio appellate case for the proposition that misunderstanding legal obligations or procedural confusion constitutes excusable neglect under Civ.R. 60(B). The Court checked the cited reporter location and found it referred instead to Gottfried-Smith v. Gottfried, which did not analyze Civ.R. 60(B). This led to a subsequent complaint before the Ohio Disciplinary Counsel: see here.
- Why does Casey Dutt v. DGK Roofing and Home, L.L.C. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and trial with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Ohio CCP. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Casey Dutt v. DGK Roofing and Home, L.L.C.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Casey Dutt v. DGK Roofing and Home, L.L.C. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.